Population problems, family policies, and the naturalization of differentiated deservedness
In February 2013, the PAP government released a Population White Paper, in which it projected an increase in Singapore’s population from 5.3 million in 2013 to 6.9 million by 2030 (National Population and Talent Division, 2013). The reactions were immediate and negative. Singaporeans, in blogs an...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147651 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | In February 2013, the PAP government released a Population White Paper, in
which it projected an increase in Singapore’s population from 5.3 million in
2013 to 6.9 million by 2030 (National Population and Talent Division, 2013).
The reactions were immediate and negative. Singaporeans, in blogs and various
online media, expressed anger and indignation – criticizing the government for
ignoring the negative effects of immigration; for favouring certain migrants
over ‘true blue Singaporeans’; and for generally ignoring people’s unhappiness
about the pressures that have arisen in recent years over high costs of living,
crowded and inadequate infrastructure, and certain angst over the erosion of
Singaporean identity. Within the Parliament itself, there were rare displays
of dissent. Many began to argue that the government should focus energies on
trying to address the low fertility problem that has ostensibly led to the need
for high rates of immigration. |
|---|