The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable)
Honorée Fanonne Jeffers’s The Age of Phillis (2020) is the culmination of nearly fif-teen years of research on the eighteenth-century enslaved poetess Phillis Wheatley, who was manumitted in 1773 and married John Peters, a Boston grocer, five years later. In “Looking for Miss Phillis,” the essay tha...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-148553 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1485532021-05-19T20:10:44Z The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) Plasencia, Sam School of Humanities Humanities::Literature::English Honorée Fanonne Jeffers’s The Age of Phillis (2020) is the culmination of nearly fif-teen years of research on the eighteenth-century enslaved poetess Phillis Wheatley, who was manumitted in 1773 and married John Peters, a Boston grocer, five years later. In “Looking for Miss Phillis,” the essay that concludes this collection of ninety-nine in-dividually titled poems, Jeffers explains that she wrote this book because she got tired of waiting for someone to write a biography of Wheatley that discussed her “free lineage,” in-cluding the family, customs, and cosmologies that informed her life before enslavement.1 All existing biographies, including Vincent Carretta’s carefully researched Phillis Wheatley: Bi-ography of a Genius in Bondage (2011), begin their treatment of Wheatley “at the Boston Harbor in 1761, with her disembarking a slave ship” (174). And what of her marriage to John Peters? Jeffers asks why literary historians “have entrusted the story of Phillis Wheatley and John Peters to a white woman [Margaretta Matilda Odell] who may have made assumptions about Wheatley’s husband, assumptions that might not just be wrong, but also the product of racial stereotypes” (173). What if Wheatley wasn’t a “sycophant” (180)? What if John Peters wasn’t a “hustler” who abused and then abandoned Wheatley (180)? The extant archives do not support these depictions of Wheatley or Peters, and the only evidence of Odell’s authorial claim to being a “collateral descendant” of the white Wheatleys is her claim itself. Published version 2021-05-11T02:42:03Z 2021-05-11T02:42:03Z 2021 Journal Article Plasencia, S. (2021). The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable). Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment, 2(2), 22-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8 2661-3336 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553 10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8 2 2 22 26 en Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment © 2021 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, & the Brigham Young University Faculty Publishing Service. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Literature::English |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Literature::English Plasencia, Sam The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
description |
Honorée Fanonne Jeffers’s The Age of Phillis (2020) is the culmination of nearly fif-teen years of research on the eighteenth-century enslaved poetess Phillis Wheatley, who was manumitted in 1773 and married John Peters, a Boston grocer, five years later. In “Looking for Miss Phillis,” the essay that concludes this collection of ninety-nine in-dividually titled poems, Jeffers explains that she wrote this book because she got tired of waiting for someone to write a biography of Wheatley that discussed her “free lineage,” in-cluding the family, customs, and cosmologies that informed her life before enslavement.1 All existing biographies, including Vincent Carretta’s carefully researched Phillis Wheatley: Bi-ography of a Genius in Bondage (2011), begin their treatment of Wheatley “at the Boston Harbor in 1761, with her disembarking a slave ship” (174). And what of her marriage to John Peters? Jeffers asks why literary historians “have entrusted the story of Phillis Wheatley and John Peters to a white woman [Margaretta Matilda Odell] who may have made assumptions about Wheatley’s husband, assumptions that might not just be wrong, but also the product of racial stereotypes” (173). What if Wheatley wasn’t a “sycophant” (180)? What if John Peters wasn’t a “hustler” who abused and then abandoned Wheatley (180)? The extant archives do not support these depictions of Wheatley or Peters, and the only evidence of Odell’s authorial claim to being a “collateral descendant” of the white Wheatleys is her claim itself. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Plasencia, Sam |
format |
Article |
author |
Plasencia, Sam |
author_sort |
Plasencia, Sam |
title |
The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
title_short |
The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
title_full |
The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
title_fullStr |
The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) |
title_sort |
black radical tradition in the age of phillis — the age of phillis (roundtable) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553 |
_version_ |
1701270597988777984 |