No, you're not allowed : the effect of reactance on a crisis simulation task
Effective persuasive messages lay the foundation for behavioural change, whether through implicit suggestion or explicit instructions, and are pertinent in situations where directing individuals to behave prosocially is critical, such as in times of crisis. However, persuasive messages run the ri...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150348 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Effective persuasive messages lay the foundation for behavioural change, whether through
implicit suggestion or explicit instructions, and are pertinent in situations where directing
individuals to behave prosocially is critical, such as in times of crisis. However, persuasive
messages run the risk of resistance, resulting in behaviours opposite of what was intended, a
phenomenon known as psychological reactance. Psychological reactance occurs when
individuals experience threats to their freedom, triggering motivational behaviours to restore
their freedom. Reactance has been conceptualised as an intertwined model of negative affect
(anger) and cognitions (counterarguments), and certain message styles such as controlling
and vivid language have been found to elicit freedom threat. Till date, no studies have
investigated the effects of psychological reactance on individuals’ prosocial behaviours when
given a persuasive, prosocial message in a crisis context. This study investigated the effects
of controlling language on the experience of psychological reactance in a computer-based
simulation of a crisis, and how this experience subsequently affects helping behaviour. It was
hypothesised that participants who were exposed to freedom threat via the controlling
instruction would show behaviour that attempts to restore their freedom and perceive
themselves to engage in more pro-self behaviour afterwards. However, no significant
differences in helping behaviour were found between participants who read controlling,
reactance-inducing priming instructions and those who read neutral instructions. Possible
strategies and future directions for the reactance literature are also presented. |
---|