Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport

Cricket occupies an ambivalent place in the Australian cultural imaginary, caught between former colonial origins and current pluralist aspirations, and retaining conservative leanings that can veer into ‘ugly assimilationism’. Elite representatives are variably celebrated as national icons or uneas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wade, Matthew
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151806
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-151806
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1518062021-10-18T08:37:29Z Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport Wade, Matthew School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Sociology Deviance Governance Cricket occupies an ambivalent place in the Australian cultural imaginary, caught between former colonial origins and current pluralist aspirations, and retaining conservative leanings that can veer into ‘ugly assimilationism’. Elite representatives are variably celebrated as national icons or uneasy sources of collective identity, given tendencies to become ‘Ugly Australians’. Within the Australian cricket team, this combustive mix of nationalism, moralism, masculinity and instrumental deviance coalesced into a win-at-all-costs ethos, culminating in brazen cheating and causing apparent diplomatic embarrassment. More significant, however, were underlying strategies of self-confessedly brutal degradation of opponents. Strategic aggression and humiliation were abetted by governing bodies that demanded success but neglected to uphold ethical standards. Moral hazards and regulatory gaps incentivized players to self-set ‘the line’ of acceptable conduct, enabling injurious tactics that included intimidation, emasculation, mockery and mass invective. A complementary argument discusses populist posturing and moral hypocrisy that were emergent during the cheating scandal, for more worthy grievances languished amid the ‘crisis in cricket’. 2021-10-13T08:26:47Z 2021-10-13T08:26:47Z 2019 Journal Article Wade, M. (2019). Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport. Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 528-550. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783319833466 1440-7833 0000-0001-8401-2428 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151806 10.1177/1440783319833466 2-s2.0-85062840153 3 55 528 550 en Journal of Sociology © 2019 The Author(s). All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Sociology
Deviance
Governance
spellingShingle Social sciences::Sociology
Deviance
Governance
Wade, Matthew
Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
description Cricket occupies an ambivalent place in the Australian cultural imaginary, caught between former colonial origins and current pluralist aspirations, and retaining conservative leanings that can veer into ‘ugly assimilationism’. Elite representatives are variably celebrated as national icons or uneasy sources of collective identity, given tendencies to become ‘Ugly Australians’. Within the Australian cricket team, this combustive mix of nationalism, moralism, masculinity and instrumental deviance coalesced into a win-at-all-costs ethos, culminating in brazen cheating and causing apparent diplomatic embarrassment. More significant, however, were underlying strategies of self-confessedly brutal degradation of opponents. Strategic aggression and humiliation were abetted by governing bodies that demanded success but neglected to uphold ethical standards. Moral hazards and regulatory gaps incentivized players to self-set ‘the line’ of acceptable conduct, enabling injurious tactics that included intimidation, emasculation, mockery and mass invective. A complementary argument discusses populist posturing and moral hypocrisy that were emergent during the cheating scandal, for more worthy grievances languished amid the ‘crisis in cricket’.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Wade, Matthew
format Article
author Wade, Matthew
author_sort Wade, Matthew
title Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
title_short Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
title_full Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
title_fullStr Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
title_full_unstemmed Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
title_sort tactics of the 'ugly australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151806
_version_ 1715201483295686656