Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group vi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-153952 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1539522024-01-22T06:30:44Z Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka Kumar Ramakrishna S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research Social sciences::Political science Religious Extremism Buddhist Extremism This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft-and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism. Published version 2022-01-17T02:55:55Z 2022-01-17T02:55:55Z 2021 Journal Article Kumar Ramakrishna (2021). Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka. Religions, 12(11), 970-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel12110970 2077-1444 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952 10.3390/rel12110970 2-s2.0-85118714698 11 12 970 en Religions © 2021 The Author(s). Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Political science Religious Extremism Buddhist Extremism |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Political science Religious Extremism Buddhist Extremism Kumar Ramakrishna Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
description |
This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft-and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Kumar Ramakrishna |
format |
Article |
author |
Kumar Ramakrishna |
author_sort |
Kumar Ramakrishna |
title |
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
title_short |
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
title_full |
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
title_fullStr |
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka |
title_sort |
deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from sri lanka |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952 |
_version_ |
1789482870291562496 |