Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka

This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group vi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kumar Ramakrishna
Other Authors: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-153952
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1539522024-01-22T06:30:44Z Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka Kumar Ramakrishna S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research Social sciences::Political science Religious Extremism Buddhist Extremism This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft-and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism. Published version 2022-01-17T02:55:55Z 2022-01-17T02:55:55Z 2021 Journal Article Kumar Ramakrishna (2021). Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka. Religions, 12(11), 970-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel12110970 2077-1444 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952 10.3390/rel12110970 2-s2.0-85118714698 11 12 970 en Religions © 2021 The Author(s). Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science
Religious Extremism
Buddhist Extremism
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science
Religious Extremism
Buddhist Extremism
Kumar Ramakrishna
Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
description This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft-and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism.
author2 S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
author_facet S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Kumar Ramakrishna
format Article
author Kumar Ramakrishna
author_sort Kumar Ramakrishna
title Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
title_short Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
title_full Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from Sri Lanka
title_sort deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from sri lanka
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153952
_version_ 1789482870291562496