Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research

Through women outnumber men at a ratio of approximately 4:1 in the library and information science (LIS) field as a whole and 3:1 in academic librarianship, past studies suggest that male-authored LIS print journal articles outnumber female-authored articles both in number and in citations received....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reece-Evans, Linsay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154162
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-154162
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1541622021-12-15T20:10:37Z Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research Reece-Evans, Linsay Library and information science Through women outnumber men at a ratio of approximately 4:1 in the library and information science (LIS) field as a whole and 3:1 in academic librarianship, past studies suggest that male-authored LIS print journal articles outnumber female-authored articles both in number and in citations received. The amount of citations received can serve as an indication of status within the LIS profession and can affect chances for professional advancement. This study uses citation analysis to measure patterns of gender, authorship and citation within the LIS e-journals LIBRES and Information Research, and compares these results to Hakanson’s (2005) citation analysis of gender and citation patterns in three core LIS print journals. Results of this study suggest gendered affinity in citation and reference behavior. Findings include that from 1995-2007 more men than women published articles in LIBRES and Information Research; that both men and women referenced more male-authored articles; that men referenced male-authored articles at a greater rate than women referenced female-authored articles; that articles by women received more citations overall; and that men cited articles by men at a greater rate than they cited articles by women. Though female authorship was proportionately higher in the two LIS e-journals than in the three core LIS print journals, the imbalance in citation and reference patterns suggest that gender influences both male and female authors’ choice of references, as well as the amount of citations that authors receive. Published version 2021-12-15T08:12:47Z 2021-12-15T08:12:47Z 2010 Journal Article Reece-Evans, L. (2010). Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research. Library and Information Science Research E-Journal, 20(1), 1-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2010.1.2 1058-6768 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154162 10.32655/LIBRES.2010.1.2 1 20 1 18 en Library and Information Science Research E-Journal © 2010 Linsay Reece-Evans. All rights reserved. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Library and information science
spellingShingle Library and information science
Reece-Evans, Linsay
Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
description Through women outnumber men at a ratio of approximately 4:1 in the library and information science (LIS) field as a whole and 3:1 in academic librarianship, past studies suggest that male-authored LIS print journal articles outnumber female-authored articles both in number and in citations received. The amount of citations received can serve as an indication of status within the LIS profession and can affect chances for professional advancement. This study uses citation analysis to measure patterns of gender, authorship and citation within the LIS e-journals LIBRES and Information Research, and compares these results to Hakanson’s (2005) citation analysis of gender and citation patterns in three core LIS print journals. Results of this study suggest gendered affinity in citation and reference behavior. Findings include that from 1995-2007 more men than women published articles in LIBRES and Information Research; that both men and women referenced more male-authored articles; that men referenced male-authored articles at a greater rate than women referenced female-authored articles; that articles by women received more citations overall; and that men cited articles by men at a greater rate than they cited articles by women. Though female authorship was proportionately higher in the two LIS e-journals than in the three core LIS print journals, the imbalance in citation and reference patterns suggest that gender influences both male and female authors’ choice of references, as well as the amount of citations that authors receive.
format Article
author Reece-Evans, Linsay
author_facet Reece-Evans, Linsay
author_sort Reece-Evans, Linsay
title Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
title_short Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
title_full Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
title_fullStr Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
title_full_unstemmed Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research
title_sort gender and citation in two lis e-journals : a bibliometric analysis of libres and information research
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154162
_version_ 1720447079690534912