Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging

One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared. For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Du, Xinglin
Other Authors: Wen Bihan
Format: Thesis-Master by Coursework
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-154666
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1546662023-07-04T16:39:43Z Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging Du, Xinglin Wen Bihan School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering bihan.wen@ntu.edu.sg Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared. For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron and convolution neural network are compared in MNIST and Fashion-MNIST dataset, which comes out that convolution layers are more suitable for image input. Transfer learning is used in marble surface dataset to avoid data imbalance problems. VGG 16 and Dense 201 pre-trained model are used and VGG 16 is the better one. For semi-supervised method, autoencoder(AE) is introduced. Since the idea of AE is to compare the difference between input and output, firstly in MNIST, two criteria are discussed: Euclidean distance and cosine similarity. Based on results, cosine similarity can have a better result. Then in Fashion-MNIST dataset, fully connected layers AE and convolution AE are compared, and convolution AE leads to a better performance. For marble surface dataset, conventional AE and MemAE are compared. Based on the result, MemAE can inhibit the generalization ability and have a better result both in theory and in practice. Master of Science (Computer Control and Automation) 2022-01-03T08:06:02Z 2022-01-03T08:06:02Z 2021 Thesis-Master by Coursework Du, X. (2021). Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging. Master's thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
spellingShingle Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Du, Xinglin
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
description One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared. For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron and convolution neural network are compared in MNIST and Fashion-MNIST dataset, which comes out that convolution layers are more suitable for image input. Transfer learning is used in marble surface dataset to avoid data imbalance problems. VGG 16 and Dense 201 pre-trained model are used and VGG 16 is the better one. For semi-supervised method, autoencoder(AE) is introduced. Since the idea of AE is to compare the difference between input and output, firstly in MNIST, two criteria are discussed: Euclidean distance and cosine similarity. Based on results, cosine similarity can have a better result. Then in Fashion-MNIST dataset, fully connected layers AE and convolution AE are compared, and convolution AE leads to a better performance. For marble surface dataset, conventional AE and MemAE are compared. Based on the result, MemAE can inhibit the generalization ability and have a better result both in theory and in practice.
author2 Wen Bihan
author_facet Wen Bihan
Du, Xinglin
format Thesis-Master by Coursework
author Du, Xinglin
author_sort Du, Xinglin
title Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
title_short Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
title_full Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
title_fullStr Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
title_sort deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666
_version_ 1772828589161447424