Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging
One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared. For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis-Master by Coursework |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-154666 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1546662023-07-04T16:39:43Z Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging Du, Xinglin Wen Bihan School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering bihan.wen@ntu.edu.sg Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared. For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron and convolution neural network are compared in MNIST and Fashion-MNIST dataset, which comes out that convolution layers are more suitable for image input. Transfer learning is used in marble surface dataset to avoid data imbalance problems. VGG 16 and Dense 201 pre-trained model are used and VGG 16 is the better one. For semi-supervised method, autoencoder(AE) is introduced. Since the idea of AE is to compare the difference between input and output, firstly in MNIST, two criteria are discussed: Euclidean distance and cosine similarity. Based on results, cosine similarity can have a better result. Then in Fashion-MNIST dataset, fully connected layers AE and convolution AE are compared, and convolution AE leads to a better performance. For marble surface dataset, conventional AE and MemAE are compared. Based on the result, MemAE can inhibit the generalization ability and have a better result both in theory and in practice. Master of Science (Computer Control and Automation) 2022-01-03T08:06:02Z 2022-01-03T08:06:02Z 2021 Thesis-Master by Coursework Du, X. (2021). Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging. Master's thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Du, Xinglin Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
description |
One of the applications of deep learning is anomaly detection. In this thesis, supervised and semi-supervised deep learning anomaly detection are compared.
For supervised method, three methods are used: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Multilayer perceptron and convolution neural network are compared in MNIST and Fashion-MNIST dataset, which comes out that convolution layers are more suitable for image input. Transfer learning is used in marble surface dataset to avoid data imbalance problems. VGG 16 and Dense 201 pre-trained model are used and VGG 16 is the better one.
For semi-supervised method, autoencoder(AE) is introduced. Since the idea of AE is to compare the difference between input and output, firstly in MNIST, two criteria are discussed: Euclidean distance and cosine similarity. Based on results, cosine similarity can have a better result. Then in Fashion-MNIST dataset, fully connected layers AE and convolution AE are compared, and convolution AE leads to a better performance. For marble surface dataset, conventional AE and MemAE are compared. Based on the result, MemAE can inhibit the generalization ability and have a better result both in theory and in practice. |
author2 |
Wen Bihan |
author_facet |
Wen Bihan Du, Xinglin |
format |
Thesis-Master by Coursework |
author |
Du, Xinglin |
author_sort |
Du, Xinglin |
title |
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
title_short |
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
title_full |
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
title_fullStr |
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
title_sort |
deep learning for anomaly detection in computational imaging |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154666 |
_version_ |
1772828589161447424 |