Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang

Previous explanations on China's counterterrorism strategy have highlighted the results of China's strategy of repression in Xinjiang, the historical antecedents and institutional foundations of its counterterrorism policies, as well as international and domestic sources of China's co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kam, Stefanie, Clarke, Michael
Other Authors: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-155028
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1550282022-02-23T05:55:36Z Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang Kam, Stefanie Clarke, Michael S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Political science::International relations China Chinese Politics Counterterrorism Previous explanations on China's counterterrorism strategy have highlighted the results of China's strategy of repression in Xinjiang, the historical antecedents and institutional foundations of its counterterrorism policies, as well as international and domestic sources of China's counterterrorism strategy. While acknowledging the importance of all these dimensions, this article draws attention to a largely neglected feature of China's counterterrorism strategy: the Chinese party-state's social engineering of Xinjiang. Building on Maoist-era practices such as the mass line and the ‘friend vs. enemy’ binary, the Communist party under Xi Jinping has integrated surveillance technologies as part of its strategy of preventive counterterrorism and ‘de-extremization’. This article argues that the Chinese party-state's embrace of modern technologies, a weak liberal tradition in China, Xi Jinping's rise to power in late 2012, and the appointment of Chen Quanguo as Xinjiang's party-secretary in 2016, provides the socio-political background for the intensification of securitization, surveillance and introduction of ‘re-education and training centres’ in Xinjiang. Surveillance technologies now complement collective, face-to-face methods of surveillance and Maoist-era techniques of mass mobilization, enabling the Chinese party-state to govern and manage the biopolitical spaces of Uyghurs with greater intensity, according to the state's precise norms. The legalization and institutionalization of ‘de-extremization’ has also led to the shift from mass ‘de-extremization’ propaganda to ‘drip-irrigation’ ideological and political re-education of individuals deemed at risk of extremism. The result is an increased capacity by the Chinese party-state to surveil and control the region, and to more effectively negate the possibility of individual resistance. 2022-02-23T05:55:36Z 2022-02-23T05:55:36Z 2021 Journal Article Kam, S. & Clarke, M. (2021). Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang. International Affairs, 97(3), 625-642. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab038 0020-5850 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155028 10.1093/ia/iiab038 2-s2.0-85107537946 3 97 625 642 en International Affairs © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science::International relations
China
Chinese Politics
Counterterrorism
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science::International relations
China
Chinese Politics
Counterterrorism
Kam, Stefanie
Clarke, Michael
Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
description Previous explanations on China's counterterrorism strategy have highlighted the results of China's strategy of repression in Xinjiang, the historical antecedents and institutional foundations of its counterterrorism policies, as well as international and domestic sources of China's counterterrorism strategy. While acknowledging the importance of all these dimensions, this article draws attention to a largely neglected feature of China's counterterrorism strategy: the Chinese party-state's social engineering of Xinjiang. Building on Maoist-era practices such as the mass line and the ‘friend vs. enemy’ binary, the Communist party under Xi Jinping has integrated surveillance technologies as part of its strategy of preventive counterterrorism and ‘de-extremization’. This article argues that the Chinese party-state's embrace of modern technologies, a weak liberal tradition in China, Xi Jinping's rise to power in late 2012, and the appointment of Chen Quanguo as Xinjiang's party-secretary in 2016, provides the socio-political background for the intensification of securitization, surveillance and introduction of ‘re-education and training centres’ in Xinjiang. Surveillance technologies now complement collective, face-to-face methods of surveillance and Maoist-era techniques of mass mobilization, enabling the Chinese party-state to govern and manage the biopolitical spaces of Uyghurs with greater intensity, according to the state's precise norms. The legalization and institutionalization of ‘de-extremization’ has also led to the shift from mass ‘de-extremization’ propaganda to ‘drip-irrigation’ ideological and political re-education of individuals deemed at risk of extremism. The result is an increased capacity by the Chinese party-state to surveil and control the region, and to more effectively negate the possibility of individual resistance.
author2 S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
author_facet S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Kam, Stefanie
Clarke, Michael
format Article
author Kam, Stefanie
Clarke, Michael
author_sort Kam, Stefanie
title Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
title_short Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
title_full Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
title_fullStr Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
title_full_unstemmed Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang
title_sort securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in xinjiang
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155028
_version_ 1725985570617819136