Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding

How should we understand the relationship between binary belief and degree of belief? To answer this question, we should look to desire. Whatever relationship we think holds between desire and degree of desire should be used as our model for the relationship we think holds between belief and degree...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Forcehimes, Andrew T.
Other Authors: School of Humanities
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155066
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-155066
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1550662022-02-07T08:35:02Z Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding Forcehimes, Andrew T. School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Degree of Belief Degree of Desire How should we understand the relationship between binary belief and degree of belief? To answer this question, we should look to desire. Whatever relationship we think holds between desire and degree of desire should be used as our model for the relationship we think holds between belief and degree of belief. This parity pushes us towards an account that treats the binary attitudes as primary. But if we take binary beliefs as primary, we seem to face a serious problem. Binary beliefs are insufficiently discriminating. If we treat them as primary, we will lack the resources needed for fruitful theorizing. This problem can, I argue, be solved if we think of an agent’s degree of belief that p as reducible to her binary believing that p and the change in the apparent reasons that would be needed to get her to withhold. Ministry of Education (MOE) This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (RG62/19 (NS)). 2022-02-07T08:35:02Z 2022-02-07T08:35:02Z 2021 Journal Article Forcehimes, A. T. (2021). Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding. Philosophical Studies, 178(3), 963-981. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01467-2 0031-8116 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155066 10.1007/s11098-020-01467-2 2-s2.0-85084490446 3 178 963 981 en RG62/19 (NS) Philosophical Studies © 2020 Springer Nature B.V. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Philosophy
Degree of Belief
Degree of Desire
spellingShingle Humanities::Philosophy
Degree of Belief
Degree of Desire
Forcehimes, Andrew T.
Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
description How should we understand the relationship between binary belief and degree of belief? To answer this question, we should look to desire. Whatever relationship we think holds between desire and degree of desire should be used as our model for the relationship we think holds between belief and degree of belief. This parity pushes us towards an account that treats the binary attitudes as primary. But if we take binary beliefs as primary, we seem to face a serious problem. Binary beliefs are insufficiently discriminating. If we treat them as primary, we will lack the resources needed for fruitful theorizing. This problem can, I argue, be solved if we think of an agent’s degree of belief that p as reducible to her binary believing that p and the change in the apparent reasons that would be needed to get her to withhold.
author2 School of Humanities
author_facet School of Humanities
Forcehimes, Andrew T.
format Article
author Forcehimes, Andrew T.
author_sort Forcehimes, Andrew T.
title Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
title_short Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
title_full Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
title_fullStr Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
title_full_unstemmed Attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
title_sort attitudinal strength as distance to withholding
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155066
_version_ 1724626868590608384