A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia

Purpose: Given Wikipedia’s size and importance to the world’s information infrastructure, it can be forgotten that there exists under the same Wikimedia Foundation umbrella, a number of other volunteer wikis producing information on a variety of topics and subjects. Little research has been conducte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luyt, Brendan
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155457
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-155457
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1554572022-03-17T02:21:45Z A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia Luyt, Brendan Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Cambodia Wikipedia Purpose: Given Wikipedia’s size and importance to the world’s information infrastructure, it can be forgotten that there exists under the same Wikimedia Foundation umbrella, a number of other volunteer wikis producing information on a variety of topics and subjects. Little research has been conducted on these offshoots. In this article I examine one of the earliest of these efforts, Wikivoyage, a free wiki-based travel guidebook. Design/methodology/approach: I examine the content of Wikivoyage’s articles on the temples of Angkor, Siem Reap (the tourist gateway to the temples), the introductory page for the country of Cambodia as a whole and a sample of regional Cambodian entries. Textual and discourse analysis is the foundation of this work. Findings: The findings suggest that although Wikivoyage is not currently an exemplar of alternative tourism discourses, it certainly has potential. But that potential can only be realized if those interested in contributing to the site alternative perspectives and discourses take up the task in a sensitive manner and in accordance with the developing editing culture. Originality/value: While conceding that Wikivoyage is currently unlikely to monopolize the guidebook market anytime soon, it is still important to study this social phenomenon both for its own intrinsic interest and to assess its potential for a more enlightened and transformative tourism. Peer review: The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0104 2022-03-17T02:21:45Z 2022-03-17T02:21:45Z 2021 Journal Article Luyt, B. (2021). A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia. Online Information Review, 45(2), 356-371. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0104 1468-4527 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155457 10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0104 2-s2.0-85096954974 2 45 356 371 en Online Information Review © 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Cambodia
Wikipedia
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Cambodia
Wikipedia
Luyt, Brendan
A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
description Purpose: Given Wikipedia’s size and importance to the world’s information infrastructure, it can be forgotten that there exists under the same Wikimedia Foundation umbrella, a number of other volunteer wikis producing information on a variety of topics and subjects. Little research has been conducted on these offshoots. In this article I examine one of the earliest of these efforts, Wikivoyage, a free wiki-based travel guidebook. Design/methodology/approach: I examine the content of Wikivoyage’s articles on the temples of Angkor, Siem Reap (the tourist gateway to the temples), the introductory page for the country of Cambodia as a whole and a sample of regional Cambodian entries. Textual and discourse analysis is the foundation of this work. Findings: The findings suggest that although Wikivoyage is not currently an exemplar of alternative tourism discourses, it certainly has potential. But that potential can only be realized if those interested in contributing to the site alternative perspectives and discourses take up the task in a sensitive manner and in accordance with the developing editing culture. Originality/value: While conceding that Wikivoyage is currently unlikely to monopolize the guidebook market anytime soon, it is still important to study this social phenomenon both for its own intrinsic interest and to assess its potential for a more enlightened and transformative tourism. Peer review: The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0104
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Luyt, Brendan
format Article
author Luyt, Brendan
author_sort Luyt, Brendan
title A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
title_short A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
title_full A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
title_fullStr A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
title_full_unstemmed A new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? Wikivoyage and Cambodia
title_sort new kind of travel guide or more of the same ? wikivoyage and cambodia
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155457
_version_ 1728433364019445760