Crash area estimation for ground risk of small unmanned aerial vehicles due to propulsion system failures

Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are expected to be used for different applications like parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography in the urban area. However, UAVs usually uses an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Hasrizam Che Man, Hu, Haoliang, Low, Kin Huat
Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155948
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are expected to be used for different applications like parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography in the urban area. However, UAVs usually uses an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, which means it is not as reliable as the manned aircraft system and may result in failure during operation and then crash to the ground. At present, there is almost no publication about the high-fidelity modeling used by UAVs to calculate the crash trajectory and point of crash. The experimental data for modeling and simulation verification of multi-rotor aircraft is limited. So far, crash trajectory prediction has been limited to point mass or ballistic methods, and these methods are usually only suitable for complete power failure and without any control system. This study intends to investigate the effects of different UAV failure modes on its crash trajectory and crash area compared to the ballistic model by using ADAMS and MATLAB co-simulation methods. Conclusions from the study show the crash trajectory, flight distance and impact speed of the UAV under four failure modes, which are quite different from the ballistic trajectory. The findings can potentially contribute to better risk assessment of the multi-rotor sUAV in the urban environment operation.