Fictive constructions in visual space: counter-mapping colonial Singapore from 1860-1910
Mainstream written narratives of Singapore from the early 20th century, such as One Hundred Years of Singapore (1921) and An Anecdotal History of Old Times in Singapore (1902), created a heavily fictionalized historical record steeped in myths, legends, and fantasies. Such fictional constructions...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis-Master by Coursework |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157093 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Mainstream written narratives of Singapore from the early 20th century, such as One Hundred
Years of Singapore (1921) and An Anecdotal History of Old Times in Singapore (1902), created
a heavily fictionalized historical record steeped in myths, legends, and fantasies. Such fictional
constructions were augmented by visual representations from colonial-era Singapore (1860–
1910): landscapes and botanical drawings; early photographic studios; and museum exhibition
displays. Through close examination of such archival material from these five transformative
decades, this paper examines how fantastical accounts of a place, its geographies, its peoples,
and its epistemological structures were created and established as factual record in part due to
widely-circulated visual representations. Furthermore, it argues that much existing scholarship
and research in the region—from museum exhibitions to studies that remain heavily indebted to
colonial records and archives established by a British colonial government catering to a
European public—contains traces of such biases; an acknowledgement of epistemic violence
within constructed visual spaces. As a counter-methodology, this study proposes to apply a
Derridean-influenced process of sous rature to archival material from colonial-era Singapore in
order to reveal an inherent indeterminacy within such material, which in turn offers multiple
divergent narratives and new meanings. In doing so, this analytical process will begin to
dismantle fictive constructions and non-factual understandings in order to “counter-map”
colonial Singapore by using the same visual material previously used to construct its fantastical
histories. |
---|