Conditional influences of the dimensions of religiosity on ecological worldviews
The causes of the global environmental crisis were said to be rooted in anthropocentric worldviews, which are shaped by religious belief systems (White, 1967). It is therefore predicted that religion’s potential to shape worldviews can instead be channelled into developing ecological worldviews,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157228 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The causes of the global environmental crisis were said to be rooted in anthropocentric
worldviews, which are shaped by religious belief systems (White, 1967). It is therefore
predicted that religion’s potential to shape worldviews can instead be channelled into
developing ecological worldviews, which could translate into more environmentally
sustainable societies. However, past studies did not yield any substantive results that showed
the ability of one’s commitment to religion, measured as religiosity, in shaping ecological
worldviews. Aiming to further investigate this, this study explored the relationship between
religiosity and the endorsement of ecological worldviews, along with the relationship
between the five dimensions of religiosity and the endorsement of ecological worldviews,
with and without the integration of environment-related topics into the real-life practices of
these dimensions of religiosity. A sample of Singaporean participants from different religious
backgrounds was recruited to take part in the study. They were asked to answer
questionnaires adopting the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS), the New Ecological
Paradigm (NEP), and the Religiosity and Environment scale. Religiosity, and each dimension
of religiosity, exhibited negative relationships with the endorsement of ecological
worldviews. However, when there was an indication of the integration of environment-related
topics into their real-life practices, it was observed that the relationship between each of the
intellectual, public practice, and religious experience dimensions and the endorsement of
ecological worldviews were more positive as compared to the condition that did not exhibit
such integration. |
---|