Electromagnetic acoustic transducer inspection of composites
Composites have seen an increase in utilization across all industries due to their desirable mechanical properties. Defects may form in composite components during manufacturing or in-service. If left undetected and untreated, these flaws may lead to catastrophic failure of the component. As a re...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157808 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Composites have seen an increase in utilization across all industries due to their desirable
mechanical properties. Defects may form in composite components during manufacturing or
in-service. If left undetected and untreated, these flaws may lead to catastrophic failure of the
component. As a result, there is a need for effective non-destructive methods to monitor and
detect flaws in composite parts and components. In this study, the use of electromagnetic
acoustic transducers (EMAT) to inspect carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) samples was
explored. Given that ultrasonic immersion testing (UT) is presently widely used across
different industries to inspect composite materials, the same samples were also tested using UT
to set a baseline for comparison. The EMAT scan results vis-à-vis the UT scan results were
then analyzed.
Three CFRP samples with different thicknesses were prepared for this study. Side-drilled holes
(SDH) and flat-bottomed holes (FBH) of varying sizes were drilled into the samples as artificial
defects. Using an automated immersion UT system, B and C-scan images of the samples were
produced. Due to equipment limitations, point testing was conducted on the same samples
using the EMAT system. The A-scans obtained from UT and EMAT were then compared. The
overall capability of the two systems to detect, size and locate defects was also discussed.
Based on the results obtained, it was found that EMAT is a viable method to detect defects in
the CFRP samples. However, determining the size and location of defect was not possible with
the experimental setup that was used, unlike UT. Regardless, there is potential for the use of
EMAT to inspect composites, especially in terms of non-contact inspection. |
---|