Modelling and experimental study of thermoelectric generator
Thermoelectric generators can convert thermal energy into electrical energy. The working principle is based on the Seebeck effect, the first thermoelectric effect discovered by Estonian physicist Thomas Seebeck in 1821. This led to the invention of the thermoelectric generator and discovery of...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/158994 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Thermoelectric generators can convert thermal energy into electrical energy. The working
principle is based on the Seebeck effect, the first thermoelectric effect discovered by Estonian
physicist Thomas Seebeck in 1821. This led to the invention of the thermoelectric generator
and discovery of other thermoelectric effects, namely the Peltier effect and Thomson effect
which are related to the change of thermal energy within the thermoelectric module.
Due to having a low electric power output and efficiency, thermoelectric generators are not
commercially viable. In recent years, with the increasing demand for clean and sustainable
energy, the thermoelectric generator has gained research interest as its intended purpose is to
recycle waste heat into electric power directly.
In this project, the steady-state heating and pulsed heating performance of the thermoelectric
generator will be studied with the aim to increase the efficiency enhancement capability of
pulsed heating over steady-state heating. As experimentation substitutes the waste heat
supplied with an electrically powered heating cartridge, it is costly and time consuming.
Thereby, modelling of the thermoelectric generator will be carried out for both steady-state and
transient conditions.
The experiments conducted examines variables which affect the overall performance of the
thermoelectric generator. These variables include the high-low state voltage input ratio, high-state heating time, low-state heating time and cycle period. It was observed that the heating
time and temperature were dependant on each other, thereby the optimal heat cycle was
obtained by controlling the minimum and maximum temperature of a heat cycle.
The modelling of the power output is based on a one-dimensional quasi-equilibrium steady-state condition where the effects of radiation heat loss was considered as negligible. Power
output was quantified by an energy balance equation taking the semiconductor legs as a control
volume considering the effects of fourier heat conduction and the three thermoelectric effects.
The temperature profile simulation utilises a finite element analysis approach through the
ANSYS software. Both models are validated against manufacturer’s date and experimental
data collected in this project.
The motivation of this project is to improve the employability of the thermoelectric generator
by increasing its efficiency which is its limiting factor. Being able to operate the thermoelectric
generator at higher efficiency can possibly see higher adoption rates as a step towards
environmental sustainability. The development of the model is also motivated by the awareness
of sustainability, by reducing the amount experimentation required through the usage of a
model can allow further research and development to be done without the need of powering
multiple equipment, especially the heating cartridges which has a high-power consumption rate.
The results of the experiments showed a pulsed heating efficiency enhancement of 31.07%
over steady-state heating. The mathematical model for predicting power output performed with
an average error of 16.85% for steady-state heating and 8.19% for transient heating compared
to experimental results.
The learning outcome of the experiments showed that controlling the maximum and minimum
temperature of the heat cycle had a significant impact on the efficiency enhancement capability.
Optimising the heating phase and energy recovery phase will result in higher efficiency
enhancement. The experimental results also ascertained the research findings that a larger high-low state voltage input ratio will produce better performance. This is because the heating phase,
which is majority of the energy input, will be significantly shortened. |
---|