Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation

This work evaluated different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) operated at pilot-scale as tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater in terms of energy efficiency, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation. Investigated AOPs included UV/H2O2, UV/Cl2, O3, O3/UV, H2O2/O3/UV, Cl2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sgroi, Massimiliano, Snyder, Shane Allen, Roccaro, Paolo
Other Authors: Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159703
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-159703
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1597032022-06-29T05:37:14Z Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation Sgroi, Massimiliano Snyder, Shane Allen Roccaro, Paolo Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute Engineering::Chemical engineering Emerging Contaminants Ozone This work evaluated different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) operated at pilot-scale as tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater in terms of energy efficiency, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation. Investigated AOPs included UV/H2O2, UV/Cl2, O3, O3/UV, H2O2/O3/UV, Cl2/O3/UV. AOPs were operated using various ozone doses (1.5-9 mg L-1), and UV fluences (191-981 mJ cm-2). Electrical energy costs necessary for the oxidation of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) (i.e., carbamazepine, fluoxetine, gemfibrozil, primidone, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) were calculated using the electrical energy per order (EEO) parameter. Ozonation resulted by far the most energy efficient process, whereas UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 showed the highest energy costs. Energy costs for AOPs based on the combination of UV and ozone were in the order O3/UV ≈ Cl2/O3/UV > H2O2/O3/UV, and they were significantly lower than energy costs of UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 processes. Cl2/O3/UV increased bromate formation, O3/UV and O3 had same levels of bromate formation, whereas H2O2/O3/UV did not form bromate. In addition, UV photolysis resulted an effective treatment for NDMA mitigation even in combination with ozone and chlorine in AOP technologies. Ozonation (doses of 1.5-6 mg L-1) was the least effective process to inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli, and enterococci. UV irradiation was able to completely inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli at low fluence (191 mJ cm-2), whereas enterococci were UV resistant. AOPs that utilized UV irradiation were the most effective processes for wastewater disinfection resulting in a complete inactivation of selected indicator organisms by low ozone dose (1.5 mg L-1) and UV fluence (191-465 mJ cm-2). This study was partially funded by the University of Catania within the “Piano di incentivi per la Ricerca di Ateneo 2020/2022” of the Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Project “Materiali e Metodologie chimico-fisiche avanzate per l’abbattimento di contaminanti Xenobiotici (MaMeX)”. 2022-06-29T05:37:14Z 2022-06-29T05:37:14Z 2021 Journal Article Sgroi, M., Snyder, S. A. & Roccaro, P. (2021). Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation. Chemosphere, 273, 128527-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128527 0045-6535 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159703 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128527 33268086 2-s2.0-85094603113 273 128527 en Chemosphere © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Chemical engineering
Emerging Contaminants
Ozone
spellingShingle Engineering::Chemical engineering
Emerging Contaminants
Ozone
Sgroi, Massimiliano
Snyder, Shane Allen
Roccaro, Paolo
Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
description This work evaluated different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) operated at pilot-scale as tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater in terms of energy efficiency, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation. Investigated AOPs included UV/H2O2, UV/Cl2, O3, O3/UV, H2O2/O3/UV, Cl2/O3/UV. AOPs were operated using various ozone doses (1.5-9 mg L-1), and UV fluences (191-981 mJ cm-2). Electrical energy costs necessary for the oxidation of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) (i.e., carbamazepine, fluoxetine, gemfibrozil, primidone, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) were calculated using the electrical energy per order (EEO) parameter. Ozonation resulted by far the most energy efficient process, whereas UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 showed the highest energy costs. Energy costs for AOPs based on the combination of UV and ozone were in the order O3/UV ≈ Cl2/O3/UV > H2O2/O3/UV, and they were significantly lower than energy costs of UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 processes. Cl2/O3/UV increased bromate formation, O3/UV and O3 had same levels of bromate formation, whereas H2O2/O3/UV did not form bromate. In addition, UV photolysis resulted an effective treatment for NDMA mitigation even in combination with ozone and chlorine in AOP technologies. Ozonation (doses of 1.5-6 mg L-1) was the least effective process to inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli, and enterococci. UV irradiation was able to completely inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli at low fluence (191 mJ cm-2), whereas enterococci were UV resistant. AOPs that utilized UV irradiation were the most effective processes for wastewater disinfection resulting in a complete inactivation of selected indicator organisms by low ozone dose (1.5 mg L-1) and UV fluence (191-465 mJ cm-2).
author2 Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute
author_facet Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute
Sgroi, Massimiliano
Snyder, Shane Allen
Roccaro, Paolo
format Article
author Sgroi, Massimiliano
Snyder, Shane Allen
Roccaro, Paolo
author_sort Sgroi, Massimiliano
title Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
title_short Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
title_full Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
title_fullStr Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
title_sort comparison of aops at pilot scale: energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159703
_version_ 1738844804276551680