Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures

Energy dissipators are commonly used in high velocity hydraulic engineering devices to dissipate hydraulic energy. Dissipators are used to in places where the excess energy could cause damage as scouring, erosion of tailwater channels, abrasion of hydraulic structures, or generation of tailwater wav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhu, Junfei.
Other Authors: Lim Siow Yong
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/15993
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-15993
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-159932023-03-03T17:03:48Z Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures Zhu, Junfei. Lim Siow Yong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Water resources Energy dissipators are commonly used in high velocity hydraulic engineering devices to dissipate hydraulic energy. Dissipators are used to in places where the excess energy could cause damage as scouring, erosion of tailwater channels, abrasion of hydraulic structures, or generation of tailwater waves. Hence, a comprehensive and intensive study about energy dissipators is of great important. The laboratory experiments shows that screens with a porosity of 40% could be used as energy dissipator effectively in small hydraulic structure, either as a single wall or a double wall. The experiments were carried out for a supercritical Froude number approximate from 6 to 17. The relative energy loss with screens was larger than classical hydraulic jump as predicted. Meanwhile, the relative energy loss can be increased 1% by receded 1cm tailgate depth. Thus the optimum tailgate depth happened when the tailgate is fully lowered. The study was compared with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study as well as Quek and Soh’s (2008) study. The relative energy loss was found to agree reasonably well with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) results while only two flow patterns were accord with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study. By using experimental data with 2cm tailgate depth, the relative energy loss from present study is conforming to Quek and Soh’s (2008) study which is significantly lower than Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study. This effect also demonstrates that relative energy loss decreasing with increasing tailgate depth. Bachelor of Engineering (Environmental Engineering) 2009-05-20T01:38:21Z 2009-05-20T01:38:21Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/15993 en Nanyang Technological University 65 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Water resources
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Water resources
Zhu, Junfei.
Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
description Energy dissipators are commonly used in high velocity hydraulic engineering devices to dissipate hydraulic energy. Dissipators are used to in places where the excess energy could cause damage as scouring, erosion of tailwater channels, abrasion of hydraulic structures, or generation of tailwater waves. Hence, a comprehensive and intensive study about energy dissipators is of great important. The laboratory experiments shows that screens with a porosity of 40% could be used as energy dissipator effectively in small hydraulic structure, either as a single wall or a double wall. The experiments were carried out for a supercritical Froude number approximate from 6 to 17. The relative energy loss with screens was larger than classical hydraulic jump as predicted. Meanwhile, the relative energy loss can be increased 1% by receded 1cm tailgate depth. Thus the optimum tailgate depth happened when the tailgate is fully lowered. The study was compared with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study as well as Quek and Soh’s (2008) study. The relative energy loss was found to agree reasonably well with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) results while only two flow patterns were accord with Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study. By using experimental data with 2cm tailgate depth, the relative energy loss from present study is conforming to Quek and Soh’s (2008) study which is significantly lower than Rajaratnam and Hurtig’s (2000) study. This effect also demonstrates that relative energy loss decreasing with increasing tailgate depth.
author2 Lim Siow Yong
author_facet Lim Siow Yong
Zhu, Junfei.
format Final Year Project
author Zhu, Junfei.
author_sort Zhu, Junfei.
title Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
title_short Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
title_full Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
title_fullStr Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
title_full_unstemmed Screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
title_sort screen-type energy dissipator for small hydraulic structures
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/15993
_version_ 1759856579307372544