“New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015

After the “watershed” General Elections (GE) in 2011, Singapore seemed primed for greater democratization. The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) adopted a softer tone, and promised an expansion of the political space. Yet, after the subsequent GE in 2015, in which the PAP attained a much higher sha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161896
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-161896
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1618962022-09-23T07:15:12Z “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015 Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Political science Singapore Backsliding After the “watershed” General Elections (GE) in 2011, Singapore seemed primed for greater democratization. The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) adopted a softer tone, and promised an expansion of the political space. Yet, after the subsequent GE in 2015, in which the PAP attained a much higher share of the votes in a resounding victory, there is an apparent democratic backsliding. Academics have been publicly censured by state leaders, legislation has been passed to strengthen the coercive capacity of the state, and dissenters have faced draconian measures. This paper investigates the reversal of democratization in Singapore, post-2015. I contend that after garnering a high level of political capital in GE 2015, the PAP reverted to its more familiar authoritarian stratagem. This was possible because of two main reasons: (1) the absence of a strong and coherent opposition which has enough credibility with the voters to cause a serious dent in the PAP’s electoral success; and (2) the absence of genuine reformers within the party to push through the agenda of democratization. Comparisons with Malaysia and the recent success of the opposition in a similar political system will be made. Broader lessons on the conditions under which authoritarianism is strengthened will also be noted. 2022-09-23T07:15:12Z 2022-09-23T07:15:12Z 2020 Journal Article Abdullah, W. J. (2020). “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015. Democratization, 27(7), 1123-1141. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1764940 1351-0347 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161896 10.1080/13510347.2020.1764940 2-s2.0-85085397217 7 27 1123 1141 en Democratization © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science
Singapore
Backsliding
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science
Singapore
Backsliding
Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt
“New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
description After the “watershed” General Elections (GE) in 2011, Singapore seemed primed for greater democratization. The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) adopted a softer tone, and promised an expansion of the political space. Yet, after the subsequent GE in 2015, in which the PAP attained a much higher share of the votes in a resounding victory, there is an apparent democratic backsliding. Academics have been publicly censured by state leaders, legislation has been passed to strengthen the coercive capacity of the state, and dissenters have faced draconian measures. This paper investigates the reversal of democratization in Singapore, post-2015. I contend that after garnering a high level of political capital in GE 2015, the PAP reverted to its more familiar authoritarian stratagem. This was possible because of two main reasons: (1) the absence of a strong and coherent opposition which has enough credibility with the voters to cause a serious dent in the PAP’s electoral success; and (2) the absence of genuine reformers within the party to push through the agenda of democratization. Comparisons with Malaysia and the recent success of the opposition in a similar political system will be made. Broader lessons on the conditions under which authoritarianism is strengthened will also be noted.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt
format Article
author Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt
author_sort Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt
title “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
title_short “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
title_full “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
title_fullStr “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
title_full_unstemmed “New normal” no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015
title_sort “new normal” no more: democratic backsliding in singapore after 2015
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161896
_version_ 1745574619583086592