Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study

The location of the interface of geological formations is an important piece of information for tunneling construction. As site investigation data are usually limited, the uncertainties in locating geological interfaces for the sections between boreholes can be large and challenging to estimate. A s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qi, Xiaohui, Wang, Hao, Chu, Jian, Chiam, Kiefer
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161981
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-161981
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1619812022-09-28T02:24:39Z Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study Qi, Xiaohui Wang, Hao Chu, Jian Chiam, Kiefer School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering::Civil engineering Geological Interface Rockhead The location of the interface of geological formations is an important piece of information for tunneling construction. As site investigation data are usually limited, the uncertainties in locating geological interfaces for the sections between boreholes can be large and challenging to estimate. A suitable geostatistical method is thus needed for spatial prediction of the geological interfaces. In this paper, the performance of three commonly used spatial prediction methods, namely the multivariate adaptive spline regression (MARS), conditional random field (CRF) method, and thin-plate spline interpolation (TPSI) methods, are evaluated for two-dimensional cases using the boreholes data from three sites in Singapore. The prediction accuracies, patterns of the predicted surfaces, and prediction uncertainties obtained from the three methods are compared. A zonation is also proposed to improve the prediction accuracy of the MARS method. The results indicate that the MARS method can show the spatial trend of the geological interface more clearly than the other two methods. The TPSI method produces undesirable oscillations of the surface of geological interfaces and the CRF method may underestimate the extreme values of the geological interface elevations. In general, the prediction accuracy of the MARS method is similar to that of the CRF method, but higher than that of the TPSI method. For cases with very limited data in geologically complex areas, the MARS may have larger errors than the CRF method. However, the accuracy of the former can be significantly improved if a reasonable zonation is performed. Ministry of National Development (MND) National Research Foundation (NRF) This research is supported by the Singapore Ministry of National Development and the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office under the Land and Liveability National Innovation Challenge (L2NIC) Research Programme (Award No. L2NICCFP2-2015-1). 2022-09-28T02:24:38Z 2022-09-28T02:24:38Z 2022 Journal Article Qi, X., Wang, H., Chu, J. & Chiam, K. (2022). Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 121, 104329-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104329 0886-7798 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161981 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104329 2-s2.0-85121928982 121 104329 en L2NICCFP2-2015-1 Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Civil engineering
Geological Interface
Rockhead
spellingShingle Engineering::Civil engineering
Geological Interface
Rockhead
Qi, Xiaohui
Wang, Hao
Chu, Jian
Chiam, Kiefer
Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
description The location of the interface of geological formations is an important piece of information for tunneling construction. As site investigation data are usually limited, the uncertainties in locating geological interfaces for the sections between boreholes can be large and challenging to estimate. A suitable geostatistical method is thus needed for spatial prediction of the geological interfaces. In this paper, the performance of three commonly used spatial prediction methods, namely the multivariate adaptive spline regression (MARS), conditional random field (CRF) method, and thin-plate spline interpolation (TPSI) methods, are evaluated for two-dimensional cases using the boreholes data from three sites in Singapore. The prediction accuracies, patterns of the predicted surfaces, and prediction uncertainties obtained from the three methods are compared. A zonation is also proposed to improve the prediction accuracy of the MARS method. The results indicate that the MARS method can show the spatial trend of the geological interface more clearly than the other two methods. The TPSI method produces undesirable oscillations of the surface of geological interfaces and the CRF method may underestimate the extreme values of the geological interface elevations. In general, the prediction accuracy of the MARS method is similar to that of the CRF method, but higher than that of the TPSI method. For cases with very limited data in geologically complex areas, the MARS may have larger errors than the CRF method. However, the accuracy of the former can be significantly improved if a reasonable zonation is performed.
author2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Qi, Xiaohui
Wang, Hao
Chu, Jian
Chiam, Kiefer
format Article
author Qi, Xiaohui
Wang, Hao
Chu, Jian
Chiam, Kiefer
author_sort Qi, Xiaohui
title Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
title_short Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
title_full Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
title_fullStr Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
title_sort two-dimensional prediction of the interface of geological formations: a comparative study
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161981
_version_ 1745574657989279744