Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables
This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to the force platform of the Isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test. 20 national female and male athletes (age: 19.25 6.008 years) from various sporting and training backgrounds partic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162559 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-162559 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1625592023-09-13T02:32:34Z Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables Janarthanam, Luke Mahendran - National Youth Sports Institute Robotics Research Centre Teo Wei Peng weipeng.teo@nie.edu.sg Science::General This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to the force platform of the Isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test. 20 national female and male athletes (age: 19.25 6.008 years) from various sporting and training backgrounds participated in 2 test sessions conducted a week apart from one another. They performed 3 IMTP efforts for each session, separated by a 2min rest between each trial. Peak force, rate of force development (RFD), and time-specific point values (100, 200, 300ms) were compared across devices and within devices. The isometric dynamometer reported high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.879, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.755 - 0.942; Pearson’s product correlation r = 0.876; p = - 0.650) and acceptable validity (ICC = 0.973, 90% CI: 0.942 - 0.987, r = -0.284; p = 0.204) for peak force values. However, significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the dynamometer and force platform for RFD and force at the time-specific points. The dynamometer also did not show acceptable reliability for these measures of the IMTP assessment. Thus, the isometric dynamometer is a valid and reliable instrument to measure peak force, but not RFD and force at time-specific points. This supports the usage of the device as a portable and more affordable option compared to a traditional force platform to measure peak force. However, coaches and practitioners should understand that values from these 2 devices are not interchangeable. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2022-11-01T04:05:19Z 2022-11-01T04:05:19Z 2022 Final Year Project (FYP) Janarthanam, L. M. (2022). Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162559 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162559 en BM-EXP-031 application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::General |
spellingShingle |
Science::General Janarthanam, Luke Mahendran Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
description |
This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to the force platform of the Isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test. 20 national female and male athletes (age: 19.25 6.008 years) from various sporting and training backgrounds participated in 2 test sessions conducted a week apart from one another. They performed 3 IMTP efforts for each session, separated by a 2min rest between each trial. Peak force, rate of force development (RFD), and time-specific point values (100, 200, 300ms) were compared across devices and within devices. The isometric dynamometer reported high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.879, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.755 - 0.942; Pearson’s product correlation r = 0.876; p = - 0.650) and acceptable validity (ICC = 0.973, 90% CI: 0.942 - 0.987, r = -0.284; p = 0.204) for peak force values. However, significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the dynamometer and force platform for RFD and force at the time-specific points. The dynamometer also did not show acceptable reliability for these measures of the IMTP assessment. Thus, the isometric dynamometer is a valid and reliable instrument to measure peak force, but not RFD and force at time-specific points. This supports the usage of the device as a portable and more affordable option compared to a traditional force platform to measure peak force. However, coaches and practitioners should understand that values from these 2 devices are not interchangeable. |
author2 |
- |
author_facet |
- Janarthanam, Luke Mahendran |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Janarthanam, Luke Mahendran |
author_sort |
Janarthanam, Luke Mahendran |
title |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
title_short |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
title_full |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
title_fullStr |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
title_sort |
validity, reliability and sensitivity of a portable isometric dynamometer compared to a force plate to measure strength performance variables |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162559 |
_version_ |
1779156695962877952 |