Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-162787 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1627872022-11-13T23:31:26Z Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali - Burns Stephen Francis stephen.burns@nie.edu.sg Science::General The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15-min warm-up before a 5km outdoor running time-trial. There was no significant difference in mean performance time between ICE (1474±116 s) and CON (1475±85 s; p=0.986) but 9 participants showed an improvement in performance. There was no significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=1.000) and heart rate (p=1.000) prior to the run between trials. There was a significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=0.026) and heart rate (p=0.047) during the run between ICE and CON. At the end of the time-trial, estimated core temperature (p<0.001) was higher in ICE (40.2±0.8°C) than CON (39.4±0.4°C) but heart rate showed no significant difference (p=1.000). Although one serving of hydration bar was not enough to lower the core temperature significantly, it was effective in reducing participant’s perception of thermoregulatory strain and increasing perceived effort to improve performance. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2022-11-09T03:00:46Z 2022-11-09T03:00:46Z 2022 Final Year Project (FYP) Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali (2022). Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::General |
spellingShingle |
Science::General Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
description |
The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15-min warm-up before a 5km outdoor running time-trial. There was no significant difference in mean performance time between ICE (1474±116 s) and CON (1475±85 s; p=0.986) but 9 participants showed an improvement in performance. There was no significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=1.000) and heart rate (p=1.000) prior to the run between trials. There was a significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=0.026) and heart rate (p=0.047) during the run between ICE and CON. At the end of the time-trial, estimated core temperature (p<0.001) was higher in ICE (40.2±0.8°C) than CON (39.4±0.4°C) but heart rate showed no significant difference (p=1.000). Although one serving of hydration bar was not enough to lower the core temperature significantly, it was effective in reducing participant’s perception of thermoregulatory strain and increasing perceived effort to improve performance. |
author2 |
- |
author_facet |
- Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali |
author_sort |
Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali |
title |
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
title_short |
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
title_full |
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
title_fullStr |
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
title_sort |
physiological effects of 100plus(tm) chilled drink versus 100plus(tm) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 |
_version_ |
1751548507966144512 |