Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes

The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali
Other Authors: -
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-162787
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1627872022-11-13T23:31:26Z Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali - Burns Stephen Francis stephen.burns@nie.edu.sg Science::General The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15-min warm-up before a 5km outdoor running time-trial. There was no significant difference in mean performance time between ICE (1474±116 s) and CON (1475±85 s; p=0.986) but 9 participants showed an improvement in performance. There was no significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=1.000) and heart rate (p=1.000) prior to the run between trials. There was a significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=0.026) and heart rate (p=0.047) during the run between ICE and CON. At the end of the time-trial, estimated core temperature (p<0.001) was higher in ICE (40.2±0.8°C) than CON (39.4±0.4°C) but heart rate showed no significant difference (p=1.000). Although one serving of hydration bar was not enough to lower the core temperature significantly, it was effective in reducing participant’s perception of thermoregulatory strain and increasing perceived effort to improve performance. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2022-11-09T03:00:46Z 2022-11-09T03:00:46Z 2022 Final Year Project (FYP) Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali (2022). Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::General
spellingShingle Science::General
Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali
Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
description The purpose of the study was to investigate the possible ergogenic and physiological effects of 100PLUS hydration bar on 5 kilometre endurance run in males. 14 participants consumed either 1 100PLUS hydration bar ( − 4°C; ICE) or 7.5 g · kg − 1 of chilled 100PLUS drink ( 4°C; CON) and performed a 15-min warm-up before a 5km outdoor running time-trial. There was no significant difference in mean performance time between ICE (1474±116 s) and CON (1475±85 s; p=0.986) but 9 participants showed an improvement in performance. There was no significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=1.000) and heart rate (p=1.000) prior to the run between trials. There was a significant difference in estimated core temperature (p=0.026) and heart rate (p=0.047) during the run between ICE and CON. At the end of the time-trial, estimated core temperature (p<0.001) was higher in ICE (40.2±0.8°C) than CON (39.4±0.4°C) but heart rate showed no significant difference (p=1.000). Although one serving of hydration bar was not enough to lower the core temperature significantly, it was effective in reducing participant’s perception of thermoregulatory strain and increasing perceived effort to improve performance.
author2 -
author_facet -
Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali
format Final Year Project
author Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali
author_sort Muhammad Nizal Bin Razali
title Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
title_short Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
title_full Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
title_fullStr Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
title_full_unstemmed Physiological effects of 100PLUS(TM) chilled drink versus 100PLUS(TM) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
title_sort physiological effects of 100plus(tm) chilled drink versus 100plus(tm) hydration bar as a pre-cooling strategy on 5 kilometre endurance run in male athletes
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162787
_version_ 1751548507966144512