The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions
It has been three decades since comparative philosophers began to associate the Confucian concept of ren 仁 with contemporary Western care ethics. It would be useful to revisit the issue and to reassess related debates. In this essay, I first contextualize this discourse by tracing the emergence of c...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163059 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-163059 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1630592023-03-11T20:06:21Z The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions Li, Chenyang School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Ethics Confucian It has been three decades since comparative philosophers began to associate the Confucian concept of ren 仁 with contemporary Western care ethics. It would be useful to revisit the issue and to reassess related debates. In this essay, I first contextualize this discourse by tracing the emergence of care as a philosophical concept in the West and explicate the Confucian concept of ren in terms of care as it is formulated in classic texts. Then I respond to challenges, including opposing views from influential care ethicists Nel Noddings and Virginia Held. I also discuss some promising studies to further this discourse. Ministry of Education (MOE) Submitted/Accepted version esearch for this essay was supported by a grant from Singapore's Ministry of Education (#021573-00001). 2022-11-18T02:54:59Z 2022-11-18T02:54:59Z 2022 Journal Article Li, C. (2022). The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions. Philosophy Compass, 17(9), e12868-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12868 1747-9991 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163059 10.1111/phc3.12868 2-s2.0-85135537247 9 17 e12868 en MOE 021573-00001 Philosophy Compass © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Li, C. (2022). The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions. Philosophy Compass, 17(9), e12868-, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12868. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Philosophy Ethics Confucian |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Philosophy Ethics Confucian Li, Chenyang The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
description |
It has been three decades since comparative philosophers began to associate the Confucian concept of ren 仁 with contemporary Western care ethics. It would be useful to revisit the issue and to reassess related debates. In this essay, I first contextualize this discourse by tracing the emergence of care as a philosophical concept in the West and explicate the Confucian concept of ren in terms of care as it is formulated in classic texts. Then I respond to challenges, including opposing views from influential care ethicists Nel Noddings and Virginia Held. I also discuss some promising studies to further this discourse. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Li, Chenyang |
format |
Article |
author |
Li, Chenyang |
author_sort |
Li, Chenyang |
title |
The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
title_short |
The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
title_full |
The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
title_fullStr |
The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Confucian Ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
title_sort |
confucian ren and care debate: reassessment, development, and future directions |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163059 |
_version_ |
1761781638204751872 |