A deep learning-based GPR forward solver for predicting B-scans of subsurface objects

The forward full-wave modeling of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) facilitates the understanding and interpretation of GPR data. Traditional forward solvers require excessive computational resources, especially when their repetitive executions are needed in signal processing and/or machine learning al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dai, Qiqi, Lee, Yee Hui, Sun, Hai-Han, Qian, Jiwei, Ow, Genevieve, Mohamed Lokman Mohd Yusof, Yucel, Abdulkadir C.
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163834
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:The forward full-wave modeling of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) facilitates the understanding and interpretation of GPR data. Traditional forward solvers require excessive computational resources, especially when their repetitive executions are needed in signal processing and/or machine learning algorithms for GPR data inversion. To alleviate the computational burden, a deep learning-based 2D GPR forward solver is proposed to predict the GPR B-scans of subsurface objects buried in the heterogeneous soil. The proposed solver is constructed as a bimodal encoder-decoder neural network. Two encoders followed by an adaptive feature fusion module are designed to extract informative features from the subsurface permittivity and conductivity maps. The decoder subsequently constructs the B-scans from the fused feature representations. To enhance the network's generalization capability, transfer learning is employed to fine-tune the network for new scenarios vastly different from those in training set. Numerical results show that the proposed solver achieves a mean relative error of 1.28%. For predicting the B-scan of one subsurface object, the proposed solver requires 12 milliseconds, which is 22,500x less than the time required by a classical physics-based solver.