Scanning electron microscope analysis of 12th-16th century stoneware and porcelain in the archaeology of Singapore and Kota Cina in Sumatra, and its implications
Stoneware and porcelain artefacts excavated from Kota Cina in Northern Sumatra and Singapore at the end of the Malay Peninsula remain some of the most compelling archaeological evidence of these settlements during the Song to Yuan, and Yuan to Ming dynasties, respectively. In this dissertation, I us...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 其他作者: | |
| 格式: | Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
Nanyang Technological University
2023
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164210 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 總結: | Stoneware and porcelain artefacts excavated from Kota Cina in Northern Sumatra and Singapore at the end of the Malay Peninsula remain some of the most compelling archaeological evidence of these settlements during the Song to Yuan, and Yuan to Ming dynasties, respectively. In this dissertation, I used scanning electron microscopy to measure these two settlements’ archaeological high-fired ceramics with the aim of inferring formulas for their body pastes and glazes, and employed statistical testing to quantify differences in these formulas within and between ceramic categories recorded at these sites. This was with the goal of determining if ceramic forms and styles corresponded with variations of raw materials and technologies used in making these traded vessels.
The porcelain and stoneware exported to Singapore appear to have differed considerably in their manufacturing process from an early stage. Stoneware differed to varying extents between sherds of the same category at Kota Cina and Singapore; one significant change in ceramic categories between the settlements was the relative consistency in Singaporean “mercury jars” despite its sample being larger than Kota Cina’s. Comparing these sherds with vessels identified with contemporary Chinese kilns reveals a broad compatibility with technologies of the time but an unprecedentedly elevated use of plant ash in glazing relative to Chinese kilns. Making further conclusions on Kota Cina and Singapore’s ceramic market preferences requires studies of more sites within Southeast Asia, especially contemporaries of both settlements, to determine whether differences were greater over time or between regions, or were possibly even shaped by settlements’ demographics. |
|---|