Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis

In this review of “Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis”, two major categories of reverse osmosis membranes namely asymmetric and thin-film composite membranes were discussed. Two common polymer materials used to manufacture reverse osmosis membranes are cellulose acetate and p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ng, Elane Yi Ting.
Other Authors: Loo Sun Sun Leslie
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16577
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-16577
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-165772023-03-03T15:36:04Z Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis Ng, Elane Yi Ting. Loo Sun Sun Leslie School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Polymers and polymer manufacture In this review of “Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis”, two major categories of reverse osmosis membranes namely asymmetric and thin-film composite membranes were discussed. Two common polymer materials used to manufacture reverse osmosis membranes are cellulose acetate and polyamide. Understanding the chemical structures of the reverse osmosis membranes is very important as they affect the membrane performance in terms of salt rejection and water flux. Thin-film composite polyamide membranes (TFC, PA) can operate at larger pH variations from pH 3 to pH 11 and at lower pressure compared to cellulose acetate (CA) membranes which have to operate at narrower pH range and higher pressure. However, the shortcomings of these (TFC, PA) membranes are that they are prone to bio-fouling and oxidation by chlorine. (TFC, PA) membranes being less hydrophilic tend to attract bacteria to adhere to membrane surface and using chlorine to disinfect the feed water may also damage the membrane. In contrast, CA membranes are more tolerant to chlorine exposure and more resistant to bio-fouling due to its more hydrophilic property. Chlorine resistance (TFC, PA) membranes were manufactured using secondary diamines and nitration of the membranes. These methods were based on the theory of ring chlorination in (TFC, PA) membranes by making the ring less electron rich so as to prevent chlorination and hence improving chlorine tolerance. One method to manufacture fouling resistance (TFC, PA) membranes is to graft the membranes with hydrophilic polymer chains and the other is to introduce isocyanato group (NCO) into acyl chlorides. Bachelor of Engineering (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) 2009-05-27T04:20:36Z 2009-05-27T04:20:36Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16577 en Nanyang Technological University 66 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Polymers and polymer manufacture
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Polymers and polymer manufacture
Ng, Elane Yi Ting.
Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
description In this review of “Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis”, two major categories of reverse osmosis membranes namely asymmetric and thin-film composite membranes were discussed. Two common polymer materials used to manufacture reverse osmosis membranes are cellulose acetate and polyamide. Understanding the chemical structures of the reverse osmosis membranes is very important as they affect the membrane performance in terms of salt rejection and water flux. Thin-film composite polyamide membranes (TFC, PA) can operate at larger pH variations from pH 3 to pH 11 and at lower pressure compared to cellulose acetate (CA) membranes which have to operate at narrower pH range and higher pressure. However, the shortcomings of these (TFC, PA) membranes are that they are prone to bio-fouling and oxidation by chlorine. (TFC, PA) membranes being less hydrophilic tend to attract bacteria to adhere to membrane surface and using chlorine to disinfect the feed water may also damage the membrane. In contrast, CA membranes are more tolerant to chlorine exposure and more resistant to bio-fouling due to its more hydrophilic property. Chlorine resistance (TFC, PA) membranes were manufactured using secondary diamines and nitration of the membranes. These methods were based on the theory of ring chlorination in (TFC, PA) membranes by making the ring less electron rich so as to prevent chlorination and hence improving chlorine tolerance. One method to manufacture fouling resistance (TFC, PA) membranes is to graft the membranes with hydrophilic polymer chains and the other is to introduce isocyanato group (NCO) into acyl chlorides.
author2 Loo Sun Sun Leslie
author_facet Loo Sun Sun Leslie
Ng, Elane Yi Ting.
format Final Year Project
author Ng, Elane Yi Ting.
author_sort Ng, Elane Yi Ting.
title Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
title_short Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
title_full Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
title_fullStr Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
title_sort comparative study on polymer membranes for reverse osmosis
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16577
_version_ 1759855448794595328