Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment

Recent research has highlighted the importance of legitimacy, in determining the impact of leaders on their followers. It is believed that various sources of legitimacy can influence a leader’s effectiveness in managing and motivating their team. This study aims to investigate how different legitima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, Melody, Liang, Zi Xin, Teoh, Amas Chong Wei
Other Authors: Yeo Xiong Wei, Jonathan
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165796
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-165796
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1657962023-04-16T15:31:38Z Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment Tan, Melody Liang, Zi Xin Teoh, Amas Chong Wei Yeo Xiong Wei, Jonathan Yohanes Eko Riyanto School of Social Sciences YERIYANTO@ntu.edu.sg, jonathanyeo@ntu.edu.sg Social sciences::Economic development Recent research has highlighted the importance of legitimacy, in determining the impact of leaders on their followers. It is believed that various sources of legitimacy can influence a leader’s effectiveness in managing and motivating their team. This study aims to investigate how different legitimacy types, namely institutional and personal legitimacy, can affect cooperation among followers and whether leader selection procedure can improve cooperation. Subjects were engaged in a public goods game, which examined how various legitimacy types and leader selection mechanisms influence outcomes. Leaders were chosen through members’ vote, previous leaders’ vote, or random selection at the beginning of each round. Once selected, leaders would choose a message from a list that reflects either the institution’s or personal power before members contributed to the game. The study revealed that members under institutional legitimacy tend to contribute more on average. Moreover, the impact of leader selection mechanisms differed based on institutional and personal legitimacy. In groups under institutional legitimacy, those with voted leaders contributed the least when compared against groups randomly assigned leaders and those chosen by the previous leader. Whereas in groups under personal legitimacy, those with voted leaders had the highest contribution. No noteworthy variation in contributions was noticed between groups with randomly assigned leaders and those chosen by the previous leader. Findings from this study may provide valuable insights into the impact of leadership in behavior where cooperation is essential and may have implications in broader societal contexts. Bachelor of Arts in Economics 2023-04-12T02:23:58Z 2023-04-12T02:23:58Z 2023 Final Year Project (FYP) Tan, M., Liang, Z. X. & Teoh, A. C. W. (2023). Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165796 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165796 en HE1AY2223_02 application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Economic development
spellingShingle Social sciences::Economic development
Tan, Melody
Liang, Zi Xin
Teoh, Amas Chong Wei
Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
description Recent research has highlighted the importance of legitimacy, in determining the impact of leaders on their followers. It is believed that various sources of legitimacy can influence a leader’s effectiveness in managing and motivating their team. This study aims to investigate how different legitimacy types, namely institutional and personal legitimacy, can affect cooperation among followers and whether leader selection procedure can improve cooperation. Subjects were engaged in a public goods game, which examined how various legitimacy types and leader selection mechanisms influence outcomes. Leaders were chosen through members’ vote, previous leaders’ vote, or random selection at the beginning of each round. Once selected, leaders would choose a message from a list that reflects either the institution’s or personal power before members contributed to the game. The study revealed that members under institutional legitimacy tend to contribute more on average. Moreover, the impact of leader selection mechanisms differed based on institutional and personal legitimacy. In groups under institutional legitimacy, those with voted leaders contributed the least when compared against groups randomly assigned leaders and those chosen by the previous leader. Whereas in groups under personal legitimacy, those with voted leaders had the highest contribution. No noteworthy variation in contributions was noticed between groups with randomly assigned leaders and those chosen by the previous leader. Findings from this study may provide valuable insights into the impact of leadership in behavior where cooperation is essential and may have implications in broader societal contexts.
author2 Yeo Xiong Wei, Jonathan
author_facet Yeo Xiong Wei, Jonathan
Tan, Melody
Liang, Zi Xin
Teoh, Amas Chong Wei
format Final Year Project
author Tan, Melody
Liang, Zi Xin
Teoh, Amas Chong Wei
author_sort Tan, Melody
title Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
title_short Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
title_full Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
title_fullStr Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
title_full_unstemmed Sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
title_sort sources of leader's legitimacy, an experiment
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165796
_version_ 1764208014216134656