Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions

Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu, Qian, Lee, Chei Sian, Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-166262
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1662622023-04-23T15:36:10Z Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions Wu, Qian Lee, Chei Sian Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Responder Type Cues of Questions Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different responders. However, the research is limited regarding the types of responders based on the questions they responded to. The gap inhibits us to form a complete understanding of how questions bridge askers with responders. Moreover, how different types of responders contribute to maintaining the ecosystem of the CQA has not been studied adequately. Accordingly, we conducted an online survey to organize responders by the cues of questions. Cluster analysis was used to group responders into three types: (1) “leaders” respond to complex and popular questions, attracting many followers in CQA; (2) “socializers” answer less complex and specific questions with emotion-laden words; and (3) “specialists” respond to complex questions with high specificity but seldom use the social functions of CQAs. Finally, contributions and limitations are discussed. Submitted/Accepted version 2023-04-19T02:19:01Z 2023-04-19T02:19:01Z 2022 Journal Article Wu, Q., Lee, C. S. & Goh, D. H. (2022). Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 516-521. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.662 2373-9231 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262 10.1002/pra2.662 2-s2.0-85148423632 1 59 516 521 en Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology © 2022 The Author(s)/ASIS&T. All rights reserved. This paper was published by Wiley in Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology and is made available with permission of The Author(s)/ASIS&T. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Responder Type
Cues of Questions
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Responder Type
Cues of Questions
Wu, Qian
Lee, Chei Sian
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
description Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different responders. However, the research is limited regarding the types of responders based on the questions they responded to. The gap inhibits us to form a complete understanding of how questions bridge askers with responders. Moreover, how different types of responders contribute to maintaining the ecosystem of the CQA has not been studied adequately. Accordingly, we conducted an online survey to organize responders by the cues of questions. Cluster analysis was used to group responders into three types: (1) “leaders” respond to complex and popular questions, attracting many followers in CQA; (2) “socializers” answer less complex and specific questions with emotion-laden words; and (3) “specialists” respond to complex questions with high specificity but seldom use the social functions of CQAs. Finally, contributions and limitations are discussed.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Wu, Qian
Lee, Chei Sian
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
format Article
author Wu, Qian
Lee, Chei Sian
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
author_sort Wu, Qian
title Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
title_short Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
title_full Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
title_fullStr Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
title_full_unstemmed Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
title_sort leader, socializer or specialist? distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262
_version_ 1764208078641692672