Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions
Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-166262 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1662622023-04-23T15:36:10Z Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions Wu, Qian Lee, Chei Sian Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Responder Type Cues of Questions Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different responders. However, the research is limited regarding the types of responders based on the questions they responded to. The gap inhibits us to form a complete understanding of how questions bridge askers with responders. Moreover, how different types of responders contribute to maintaining the ecosystem of the CQA has not been studied adequately. Accordingly, we conducted an online survey to organize responders by the cues of questions. Cluster analysis was used to group responders into three types: (1) “leaders” respond to complex and popular questions, attracting many followers in CQA; (2) “socializers” answer less complex and specific questions with emotion-laden words; and (3) “specialists” respond to complex questions with high specificity but seldom use the social functions of CQAs. Finally, contributions and limitations are discussed. Submitted/Accepted version 2023-04-19T02:19:01Z 2023-04-19T02:19:01Z 2022 Journal Article Wu, Q., Lee, C. S. & Goh, D. H. (2022). Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 516-521. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.662 2373-9231 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262 10.1002/pra2.662 2-s2.0-85148423632 1 59 516 521 en Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology © 2022 The Author(s)/ASIS&T. All rights reserved. This paper was published by Wiley in Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology and is made available with permission of The Author(s)/ASIS&T. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Responder Type Cues of Questions |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Responder Type Cues of Questions Wu, Qian Lee, Chei Sian Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
description |
Community question-answering (CQA) enables responders to select questions, and respond to the questions by answering, commenting or voting. Accordingly, questions with different cues (i.e. complexity, specificity, emotional expressiveness, politeness, popularity, rewards) tend to attract different responders. However, the research is limited regarding the types of responders based on the questions they responded to. The gap inhibits us to form a complete understanding of how questions bridge askers with responders. Moreover, how different types of responders contribute to maintaining the ecosystem of the CQA has not been studied adequately. Accordingly, we conducted an online survey to organize responders by the cues of questions. Cluster analysis was used to group responders into three types: (1) “leaders” respond to complex and popular questions, attracting many followers in CQA; (2) “socializers” answer less complex and specific questions with emotion-laden words; and (3) “specialists” respond to complex questions with high specificity but seldom use the social functions of CQAs. Finally, contributions and limitations are discussed. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Wu, Qian Lee, Chei Sian Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian |
format |
Article |
author |
Wu, Qian Lee, Chei Sian Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian |
author_sort |
Wu, Qian |
title |
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
title_short |
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
title_full |
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
title_fullStr |
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Leader, socializer or specialist? Distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
title_sort |
leader, socializer or specialist? distinguishing responders with the cues of questions |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/166262 |
_version_ |
1764208078641692672 |