Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors

Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aw, You Wei
Other Authors: Vinay Kumar Kariwala
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-16677
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-166772023-03-03T15:31:54Z Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors Aw, You Wei Vinay Kumar Kariwala School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of heat in the reactor, the CFRR can either extinguish or overheat if feed conditions are extreme and prolonged. Thus, an effective control system must be implemented. It is widely perceived that Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are superior in performance as compared to simple on-off controllers. In this thesis, the performance of the PI controller for control of CFRR is investigated and is compared with the on-off controller using a simulation model constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics®. Both on-off and PI controllers are implemented for heat and mass extraction strategies. The controllers are designed to control the amount of heat or mass extracted at the midsection of the reactor, with the objective of operating the reactor at the highest possible temperature for optimal conversion of methane, and at the same time without violating the upper temperature constraint in the catalyst beds. The results suggested that the average outlet methane concentration is slightly lower and efficiency slightly higher using both P and PI control as compared to on-off control. Bachelor of Engineering (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) 2009-05-28T02:01:04Z 2009-05-28T02:01:04Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677 en Nanyang Technological University 103 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations
Aw, You Wei
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
description Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of heat in the reactor, the CFRR can either extinguish or overheat if feed conditions are extreme and prolonged. Thus, an effective control system must be implemented. It is widely perceived that Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are superior in performance as compared to simple on-off controllers. In this thesis, the performance of the PI controller for control of CFRR is investigated and is compared with the on-off controller using a simulation model constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics®. Both on-off and PI controllers are implemented for heat and mass extraction strategies. The controllers are designed to control the amount of heat or mass extracted at the midsection of the reactor, with the objective of operating the reactor at the highest possible temperature for optimal conversion of methane, and at the same time without violating the upper temperature constraint in the catalyst beds. The results suggested that the average outlet methane concentration is slightly lower and efficiency slightly higher using both P and PI control as compared to on-off control.
author2 Vinay Kumar Kariwala
author_facet Vinay Kumar Kariwala
Aw, You Wei
format Final Year Project
author Aw, You Wei
author_sort Aw, You Wei
title Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
title_short Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
title_full Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
title_fullStr Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
title_full_unstemmed Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
title_sort control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677
_version_ 1759852980915404800