Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors
Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-16677 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-166772023-03-03T15:31:54Z Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors Aw, You Wei Vinay Kumar Kariwala School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of heat in the reactor, the CFRR can either extinguish or overheat if feed conditions are extreme and prolonged. Thus, an effective control system must be implemented. It is widely perceived that Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are superior in performance as compared to simple on-off controllers. In this thesis, the performance of the PI controller for control of CFRR is investigated and is compared with the on-off controller using a simulation model constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics®. Both on-off and PI controllers are implemented for heat and mass extraction strategies. The controllers are designed to control the amount of heat or mass extracted at the midsection of the reactor, with the objective of operating the reactor at the highest possible temperature for optimal conversion of methane, and at the same time without violating the upper temperature constraint in the catalyst beds. The results suggested that the average outlet methane concentration is slightly lower and efficiency slightly higher using both P and PI control as compared to on-off control. Bachelor of Engineering (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) 2009-05-28T02:01:04Z 2009-05-28T02:01:04Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677 en Nanyang Technological University 103 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering::Processes and operations Aw, You Wei Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
description |
Catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR) is a special type of reactor that traps heat
generated by exothermic reactions and utilizes the heat to preheat the feed. To do so, it reverses the feed flow direction periodically. However, without an effective control system in place to control the amount of heat in the reactor, the CFRR can either extinguish or overheat if feed conditions are extreme and prolonged. Thus, an effective control system must be implemented.
It is widely perceived that Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are superior in performance as compared to simple on-off controllers. In this thesis, the performance of the PI controller for control of CFRR is investigated and is compared with the on-off controller using a simulation model constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics®.
Both on-off and PI controllers are implemented for heat and mass extraction strategies. The controllers are designed to control the amount of heat or mass extracted at the midsection of the reactor, with the objective of operating the reactor at the highest possible temperature for optimal conversion of methane, and at the same time without violating the upper temperature constraint in the catalyst beds.
The results suggested that the average outlet methane concentration is slightly lower and efficiency slightly higher using both P and PI control as compared to on-off control. |
author2 |
Vinay Kumar Kariwala |
author_facet |
Vinay Kumar Kariwala Aw, You Wei |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Aw, You Wei |
author_sort |
Aw, You Wei |
title |
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
title_short |
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
title_full |
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
title_fullStr |
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
title_sort |
control of catalytic flow reversal reactors |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16677 |
_version_ |
1759852980915404800 |