Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II
Over the past several years, Deep Learning (DL) has been widely regarded as a fundamental technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR or Industry 4.0), which encompasses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). In this project, the performance of Convolutional neural networ...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/167412 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-167412 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1674122023-07-07T17:53:11Z Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II Lew, Mei Tong Alex Chichung Kot School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering EACKOT@ntu.edu.sg Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Over the past several years, Deep Learning (DL) has been widely regarded as a fundamental technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR or Industry 4.0), which encompasses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). In this project, the performance of Convolutional neural network (CNN), Long short-term memory (LSTM), and Convolutional, long short-term memory deep neural network (CLDNN) models towards those standard modulation signals had been analyzed. Furthermore, the relationship between the variety of modulation signals and the validation accuracy of all these three neural network models was obtained at different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels. By providing additional training data to the neural network models, their capacity to accurately classify modulation signals had been enhanced. As a result, both CNN and CLDNN have demonstrated superior performance at high SNR levels, even when faced with a diverse range of modulation signals in the dataset. However, the classification ability of LSTM deteriorates with an increase in the number of modulation signal types present in the dataset. Furthermore, signals with a similar modulation scheme have a higher likelihood of causing misclassification. However, increasing the SNR level of the modulation signals can improve this situation. Therefore, LSTM is the optimal model for dealing with signals with similar modulation schemes. Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical and Electronic Engineering) 2023-05-26T13:03:46Z 2023-05-26T13:03:46Z 2023 Final Year Project (FYP) Lew, M. T. (2023). Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/167412 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/167412 en A3091-221 application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Lew, Mei Tong Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
description |
Over the past several years, Deep Learning (DL) has been widely regarded as a fundamental technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR or Industry 4.0), which encompasses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML).
In this project, the performance of Convolutional neural network (CNN), Long short-term memory (LSTM), and Convolutional, long short-term memory deep neural network (CLDNN) models towards those standard modulation signals had been analyzed. Furthermore, the relationship between the variety of modulation signals and the validation accuracy of all these three neural network models was obtained at different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels.
By providing additional training data to the neural network models, their capacity to accurately classify modulation signals had been enhanced. As a result, both CNN and CLDNN have demonstrated superior performance at high SNR levels, even when faced with a diverse range of modulation signals in the dataset. However, the classification ability of LSTM deteriorates with an increase in the number of modulation signal types present in the dataset.
Furthermore, signals with a similar modulation scheme have a higher likelihood of causing misclassification. However, increasing the SNR level of the modulation signals can improve this situation. Therefore, LSTM is the optimal model for dealing with signals with similar modulation schemes. |
author2 |
Alex Chichung Kot |
author_facet |
Alex Chichung Kot Lew, Mei Tong |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Lew, Mei Tong |
author_sort |
Lew, Mei Tong |
title |
Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
title_short |
Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
title_full |
Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
title_fullStr |
Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep learning for communication signal classification - part II |
title_sort |
deep learning for communication signal classification - part ii |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/167412 |
_version_ |
1772827586244640768 |