Evaporation and crystallisation of saline droplet with surfactant on smooth surfaces
The evaporation and crystallisation of saline droplets have attracted significant interest due to their potential applications in pharmaceutical production and medical diagnosis. Achieving precise control over droplet deposition is crucial in these fields, and the addition of surfactants can sig...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/167745 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The evaporation and crystallisation of saline droplets have attracted significant interest due to their
potential applications in pharmaceutical production and medical diagnosis. Achieving precise control
over droplet deposition is crucial in these fields, and the addition of surfactants can significantly affect
the spreading and evaporation rates of droplets as well as the deposition of particles in the solution.
While numerous studies have investigated the impact of surfactants on liquid droplets, very little
research has been conducted on surfactants with opposing charges mixed with salt solutions. This
project aims to examine the evaporative dynamics and crystallisation patterns of surfactant saline
solutions. Specifically, a fixed concentration of Sodium Chloride (NaCl) solution will be mixed with
two types of surfactants, Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and Sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS), at varying concentrations. The resulting droplets will be deposited on both hydrophilic silicon
wafer and hydrophobic ITO glass surfaces. Results showed that as the concentration of CTAB
increased, droplet spreading rate increased, and thicker dendrites were observed. Conversely, low
concentrations of both CTAB and SDS mixed with NaCl resulted in droplet depinning on both
substrates. The solutions that decreased in diameter did not maintain a constant circular shape during
the retraction process, resulting in an irregular and distorted shape. In addition, the distribution of
crystals varied with surfactants concentrations. At a high concentration of SDS (6.4 mM SDS), crystals
were evenly distributed. On the other hand, at lower concentrations (0.32 mM SDS and 1.6 mM SDS),
crystals were formed near the peripheral of droplet. On the other hand, concentric rings were observed
at a high concentration of 0.8 mM CTAB with concentration of SDS below 6.4 mM SDS. Furthermore,
solutions with a concentration of 0.8 mM CTAB and 1.6 mM SDS/6.4 mM SDS, there was no
significant difference in the deposition behaviour on hydrophilic silicon wafer and hydrophobic ITO
glass. It is interesting to note that at CTAB concentrations of 0.04 mM and 0.2 mM, fewer crystals were
observed on the ITO glass substrate compared to the silicon wafer substrate. In the case of 0.8 mM
CTAB with varying SDS concentration, an unexpected result was observed where 1.6 mM SDS had the
highest initial contact angle, followed by 0.32 mM SDS. This observation suggests that CTAB played
a more significant role in the initial contact angle than SDS did. Recommended future work could
include exploring the effects of varying different concentrations of NaCl below the supersaturation
concentration range (1-15% of NaCl) and varying different concentrations of surfactants at the critical
micelle concentration (CMC) levels (1-1.5 CMC). This could potentially offer new insights into the
evaporative and crystallisation behaviour of the droplets, as well as new deposition patterns. |
---|