Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors

Image category recognition is important to access visual information on the level of objects and scene types. Much importance has recently been placed on the detection and recognition of locally (weak) affine invariant region descriptors for object recognition. SIFT descriptors are well known for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noriati Amin.
Other Authors: Chia Liang Tien
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16893
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-16893
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-168932023-03-03T20:25:42Z Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors Noriati Amin. Chia Liang Tien School of Computer Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Image processing and computer vision Image category recognition is important to access visual information on the level of objects and scene types. Much importance has recently been placed on the detection and recognition of locally (weak) affine invariant region descriptors for object recognition. SIFT descriptors are well known for its invariance to image scale and rotation, and are shown to provide robust matching across a substantial range of affine distortion, change in 3D viewpoint, addition of noise, and change in illumination (Lowe D. G., 2004). Therefore, the first section of the report, experiments on object recognition to test SIFT’s properties and reliability were discussed. The recognition proceeds by visually matching the interest points detected using Euclidean distance. These experiments used COIL (S Nene, 1996) dataset. Results obtained from these experiments showed that SIFT descriptor is scale invariant by a scale factor of 2 and it is distinctive enough for accurate object recognition. On top of that, object recognition through image classification has become another growing area of significance. The size of images is a concern in many applications. There is a need to find out the smallest possible size of an object or image that could be used in applications which gives good performance. A group of researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology have found that many recognition tasks can be solved with images as small as 32X32 pixels (Antonio Torralba, 2007). Thus, the second section of this report will present investigations conducted to find out the smallest optimal size acceptable. The image classifications were conducted using PHOW descriptors and Caltech-256 dataset. The outcomes of image classification suggested that 64X64pixels images are the smallest size that could be used to attain correct grouping for simple images with plain background. However for real images which are more complex, the smallest size that could be used to achieve better classification is 128X128 pixels. Any images of sizes smaller than that will cause difficulty in classifying them. In the rest of this report, the term “32px” refers to the image of size “32X32 pixels”. Likewise, “64 px” refers to “64x64 pixels”, “128px” refers to “128x128pixels” and so on. Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Engineering) 2009-05-28T08:54:42Z 2009-05-28T08:54:42Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16893 en Nanyang Technological University 72 pages 72 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Image processing and computer vision
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Image processing and computer vision
Noriati Amin.
Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
description Image category recognition is important to access visual information on the level of objects and scene types. Much importance has recently been placed on the detection and recognition of locally (weak) affine invariant region descriptors for object recognition. SIFT descriptors are well known for its invariance to image scale and rotation, and are shown to provide robust matching across a substantial range of affine distortion, change in 3D viewpoint, addition of noise, and change in illumination (Lowe D. G., 2004). Therefore, the first section of the report, experiments on object recognition to test SIFT’s properties and reliability were discussed. The recognition proceeds by visually matching the interest points detected using Euclidean distance. These experiments used COIL (S Nene, 1996) dataset. Results obtained from these experiments showed that SIFT descriptor is scale invariant by a scale factor of 2 and it is distinctive enough for accurate object recognition. On top of that, object recognition through image classification has become another growing area of significance. The size of images is a concern in many applications. There is a need to find out the smallest possible size of an object or image that could be used in applications which gives good performance. A group of researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology have found that many recognition tasks can be solved with images as small as 32X32 pixels (Antonio Torralba, 2007). Thus, the second section of this report will present investigations conducted to find out the smallest optimal size acceptable. The image classifications were conducted using PHOW descriptors and Caltech-256 dataset. The outcomes of image classification suggested that 64X64pixels images are the smallest size that could be used to attain correct grouping for simple images with plain background. However for real images which are more complex, the smallest size that could be used to achieve better classification is 128X128 pixels. Any images of sizes smaller than that will cause difficulty in classifying them. In the rest of this report, the term “32px” refers to the image of size “32X32 pixels”. Likewise, “64 px” refers to “64x64 pixels”, “128px” refers to “128x128pixels” and so on.
author2 Chia Liang Tien
author_facet Chia Liang Tien
Noriati Amin.
format Final Year Project
author Noriati Amin.
author_sort Noriati Amin.
title Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
title_short Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
title_full Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
title_fullStr Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
title_full_unstemmed Sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
title_sort sparse representation for object recognition : understanding detectors and descriptors
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16893
_version_ 1759855752034385920