Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies

Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmed, Saifuddin
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-169143
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1691432023-07-03T07:23:10Z Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies Ahmed, Saifuddin Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Deepfakes Cognitive Ability Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three studies in the US and Singapore supports the third-person perception (TPP) bias, such that individuals perceived deepfakes to influence others more than themselves (Study 1–3). The same subjects also show a bias in perceiving themselves as better at discerning deepfakes than others (Study 1–3). However, a deepfakes detection test suggests that the third-person perceptual gaps are not predictive of the real ability to distinguish fake from real (Study 3). Furthermore, the biases in TPP and self-perceptions about their own ability to identify deepfakes are more intensified among those with high cognitive ability (Study 2-3). The findings contribute to third-person perception literature and our current understanding of citizen engagement with deepfakes. Nanyang Technological University This work was supported by Nanyang Technological University: [Start Up Grant]. 2023-07-03T07:23:09Z 2023-07-03T07:23:09Z 2023 Journal Article Ahmed, S. (2023). Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies. Asian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 308-331. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2194886 0129-2986 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143 10.1080/01292986.2023.2194886 2-s2.0-85151074774 3 33 308 331 en NTU-SUG Asian Journal of Communication © AMIC/WKWSCI-NTU 2023. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Deepfakes
Cognitive Ability
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Deepfakes
Cognitive Ability
Ahmed, Saifuddin
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
description Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three studies in the US and Singapore supports the third-person perception (TPP) bias, such that individuals perceived deepfakes to influence others more than themselves (Study 1–3). The same subjects also show a bias in perceiving themselves as better at discerning deepfakes than others (Study 1–3). However, a deepfakes detection test suggests that the third-person perceptual gaps are not predictive of the real ability to distinguish fake from real (Study 3). Furthermore, the biases in TPP and self-perceptions about their own ability to identify deepfakes are more intensified among those with high cognitive ability (Study 2-3). The findings contribute to third-person perception literature and our current understanding of citizen engagement with deepfakes.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Ahmed, Saifuddin
format Article
author Ahmed, Saifuddin
author_sort Ahmed, Saifuddin
title Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
title_short Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
title_full Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
title_fullStr Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
title_full_unstemmed Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
title_sort examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143
_version_ 1772827481792839680