Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies
Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three stud...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-169143 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1691432023-07-03T07:23:10Z Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies Ahmed, Saifuddin Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Deepfakes Cognitive Ability Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three studies in the US and Singapore supports the third-person perception (TPP) bias, such that individuals perceived deepfakes to influence others more than themselves (Study 1–3). The same subjects also show a bias in perceiving themselves as better at discerning deepfakes than others (Study 1–3). However, a deepfakes detection test suggests that the third-person perceptual gaps are not predictive of the real ability to distinguish fake from real (Study 3). Furthermore, the biases in TPP and self-perceptions about their own ability to identify deepfakes are more intensified among those with high cognitive ability (Study 2-3). The findings contribute to third-person perception literature and our current understanding of citizen engagement with deepfakes. Nanyang Technological University This work was supported by Nanyang Technological University: [Start Up Grant]. 2023-07-03T07:23:09Z 2023-07-03T07:23:09Z 2023 Journal Article Ahmed, S. (2023). Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies. Asian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 308-331. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2194886 0129-2986 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143 10.1080/01292986.2023.2194886 2-s2.0-85151074774 3 33 308 331 en NTU-SUG Asian Journal of Communication © AMIC/WKWSCI-NTU 2023. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Deepfakes Cognitive Ability |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Deepfakes Cognitive Ability Ahmed, Saifuddin Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
description |
Deepfakes have a pernicious realism advantage over other common forms of disinformation, yet little is known about how citizens perceive deepfakes. Using the third-person effects framework, this study is one of the first attempts to examine public perceptions of deepfakes. Evidence across three studies in the US and Singapore supports the third-person perception (TPP) bias, such that individuals perceived deepfakes to influence others more than themselves (Study 1–3). The same subjects also show a bias in perceiving themselves as better at discerning deepfakes than others (Study 1–3). However, a deepfakes detection test suggests that the third-person perceptual gaps are not predictive of the real ability to distinguish fake from real (Study 3). Furthermore, the biases in TPP and self-perceptions about their own ability to identify deepfakes are more intensified among those with high cognitive ability (Study 2-3). The findings contribute to third-person perception literature and our current understanding of citizen engagement with deepfakes. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Ahmed, Saifuddin |
format |
Article |
author |
Ahmed, Saifuddin |
author_sort |
Ahmed, Saifuddin |
title |
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
title_short |
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
title_full |
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
title_fullStr |
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
title_sort |
examining public perception and cognitive biases in the presumed influence of deepfakes threat: empirical evidence of third person perception from three studies |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169143 |
_version_ |
1772827481792839680 |