Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-169243 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1692432023-07-12T15:34:41Z Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis Li, Dan Mo, Zijing She, Qianhong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Interdisciplinary Graduate School (IGS) Singapore Membrane Technology Centre Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute Engineering::Environmental engineering Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Osmotic Energy Harvesting Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmospheric batch PRO (AB-PRO), was proposed, utilizing an atmospheric tank to receive and store the intermediate diluted draw solution (DS) and a pressure exchanger to recover the pressure energy from the diluted DS before being recycled into the tank. Its performance was further compared with single-stage PRO (SS-PRO) at different flow schemes via analytic models. The results show that the AB-PRO with an infinitesimal per-cycle water recovery (r) approaches the thermodynamic maximum energy production under ideal conditions, outperforming the SS-PRO with lower efficiencies caused by under-pressurization (UP). However, when considering inefficiencies, a ~40% efficiency reduction was observed in AB-PRO owing to UP and entropy generation as the optimal r is no-longer infinitesimal. Nonetheless, AB-PRO is still significantly superior to SS-PRO at low water recoveries (R) and maintains a stable energy efficiency at various R, which is conducive to meeting the fluctuating demand in practice by flexibly adjusting R. Further mitigating pressure losses and deficiencies of energy recovery devices can significantly improve AB-PRO performance. Ministry of Education (MOE) Published version This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under the Academic Research Fund Tier 1 [RG123/21] and the Singapore Energy Centre [SgEC-Core2021-44]. 2023-07-10T04:50:55Z 2023-07-10T04:50:55Z 2023 Journal Article Li, D., Mo, Z. & She, Q. (2023). Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis. Membranes, 13(3), 354-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030354 2077-0375 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243 10.3390/membranes13030354 36984741 2-s2.0-85152213415 3 13 354 en RG123/21 SgEC-Core2021-44 Membranes © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Environmental engineering Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Osmotic Energy Harvesting |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Environmental engineering Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Osmotic Energy Harvesting Li, Dan Mo, Zijing She, Qianhong Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
description |
Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmospheric batch PRO (AB-PRO), was proposed, utilizing an atmospheric tank to receive and store the intermediate diluted draw solution (DS) and a pressure exchanger to recover the pressure energy from the diluted DS before being recycled into the tank. Its performance was further compared with single-stage PRO (SS-PRO) at different flow schemes via analytic models. The results show that the AB-PRO with an infinitesimal per-cycle water recovery (r) approaches the thermodynamic maximum energy production under ideal conditions, outperforming the SS-PRO with lower efficiencies caused by under-pressurization (UP). However, when considering inefficiencies, a ~40% efficiency reduction was observed in AB-PRO owing to UP and entropy generation as the optimal r is no-longer infinitesimal. Nonetheless, AB-PRO is still significantly superior to SS-PRO at low water recoveries (R) and maintains a stable energy efficiency at various R, which is conducive to meeting the fluctuating demand in practice by flexibly adjusting R. Further mitigating pressure losses and deficiencies of energy recovery devices can significantly improve AB-PRO performance. |
author2 |
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Li, Dan Mo, Zijing She, Qianhong |
format |
Article |
author |
Li, Dan Mo, Zijing She, Qianhong |
author_sort |
Li, Dan |
title |
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
title_short |
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
title_full |
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
title_sort |
comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243 |
_version_ |
1772826436848058368 |