Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis

Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Dan, Mo, Zijing, She, Qianhong
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-169243
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1692432023-07-12T15:34:41Z Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis Li, Dan Mo, Zijing She, Qianhong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Interdisciplinary Graduate School (IGS) Singapore Membrane Technology Centre Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute Engineering::Environmental engineering Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Osmotic Energy Harvesting Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmospheric batch PRO (AB-PRO), was proposed, utilizing an atmospheric tank to receive and store the intermediate diluted draw solution (DS) and a pressure exchanger to recover the pressure energy from the diluted DS before being recycled into the tank. Its performance was further compared with single-stage PRO (SS-PRO) at different flow schemes via analytic models. The results show that the AB-PRO with an infinitesimal per-cycle water recovery (r) approaches the thermodynamic maximum energy production under ideal conditions, outperforming the SS-PRO with lower efficiencies caused by under-pressurization (UP). However, when considering inefficiencies, a ~40% efficiency reduction was observed in AB-PRO owing to UP and entropy generation as the optimal r is no-longer infinitesimal. Nonetheless, AB-PRO is still significantly superior to SS-PRO at low water recoveries (R) and maintains a stable energy efficiency at various R, which is conducive to meeting the fluctuating demand in practice by flexibly adjusting R. Further mitigating pressure losses and deficiencies of energy recovery devices can significantly improve AB-PRO performance. Ministry of Education (MOE) Published version This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under the Academic Research Fund Tier 1 [RG123/21] and the Singapore Energy Centre [SgEC-Core2021-44]. 2023-07-10T04:50:55Z 2023-07-10T04:50:55Z 2023 Journal Article Li, D., Mo, Z. & She, Q. (2023). Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis. Membranes, 13(3), 354-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030354 2077-0375 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243 10.3390/membranes13030354 36984741 2-s2.0-85152213415 3 13 354 en RG123/21 SgEC-Core2021-44 Membranes © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Environmental engineering
Pressure-Retarded Osmosis
Osmotic Energy Harvesting
spellingShingle Engineering::Environmental engineering
Pressure-Retarded Osmosis
Osmotic Energy Harvesting
Li, Dan
Mo, Zijing
She, Qianhong
Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
description Batch pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) with varied-pressure and multiple-cycle operation using a pressurized variable-volume tank has been proposed as a high-efficiency osmotic energy harvesting technology, but it suffers scalability constraints. In this study, a more scalable batch PRO, namely, atmospheric batch PRO (AB-PRO), was proposed, utilizing an atmospheric tank to receive and store the intermediate diluted draw solution (DS) and a pressure exchanger to recover the pressure energy from the diluted DS before being recycled into the tank. Its performance was further compared with single-stage PRO (SS-PRO) at different flow schemes via analytic models. The results show that the AB-PRO with an infinitesimal per-cycle water recovery (r) approaches the thermodynamic maximum energy production under ideal conditions, outperforming the SS-PRO with lower efficiencies caused by under-pressurization (UP). However, when considering inefficiencies, a ~40% efficiency reduction was observed in AB-PRO owing to UP and entropy generation as the optimal r is no-longer infinitesimal. Nonetheless, AB-PRO is still significantly superior to SS-PRO at low water recoveries (R) and maintains a stable energy efficiency at various R, which is conducive to meeting the fluctuating demand in practice by flexibly adjusting R. Further mitigating pressure losses and deficiencies of energy recovery devices can significantly improve AB-PRO performance.
author2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Li, Dan
Mo, Zijing
She, Qianhong
format Article
author Li, Dan
Mo, Zijing
She, Qianhong
author_sort Li, Dan
title Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
title_short Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
title_full Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
title_fullStr Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
title_sort comparison of energy efficiency between atmospheric batch pressure-retarded osmosis and single-stage pressure-retarded osmosis
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169243
_version_ 1772826436848058368