Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leow, Jeffrey J., Koh, Soon Hock, Chow, Marcus W. L., Loke, Wayren, Salada, Rolando, Hong, Seok Kwan, Yeow, Yuyi, Lee, Chau Hung, Tan, Cher Heng, Tan, Teck Wei
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-169576
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1695762023-07-30T15:38:07Z Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? Leow, Jeffrey J. Koh, Soon Hock Chow, Marcus W. L. Loke, Wayren Salada, Rolando Hong, Seok Kwan Yeow, Yuyi Lee, Chau Hung Tan, Cher Heng Tan, Teck Wei Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Prostate Cancer Uronav Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion who underwent targeted and/or systematic biopsies from May 2016 to May 2020. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as any Gleason grade group ≥2 cancer. Of 545 patients who underwent MRI fusion-targeted biopsy, 222 (40.7%) were biopsy naïve, 247 (45.3%) had previous prostate biopsy(s), and 76 (13.9%) had known prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. Prostate cancer was more commonly found in biopsy-naïve men (63.5%) and those on active surveillance (68.4%) compared to those who had previous biopsies (35.2%; both P < 0.001). Systematic biopsies provided an incremental 10.4% detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve patients, versus an incremental 2.4% among those who had prior negative biopsies. Multivariable regression found age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, P = 0.03), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density ≥0.15 ng ml-2 (OR = 3.24, P < 0.001), prostate health index (PHI) ≥35 (OR = 2.43, P = 0.006), higher PI-RADS score (vs PI-RADS 3; OR = 4.59 for PI-RADS 4, and OR = 9.91 for PI-RADS 5; both P < 0.001) and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 (OR = 5.26, P = 0.013) were significantly associated with csPCa detection on targeted biopsy. In conclusion, for men undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies, systematic biopsies should not be omitted given its incremental value to targeted biopsies alone. The factors such as PSA density ≥0.15 ng ml-2, PHI ≥35, higher PI-RADS score, and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 can help identify men at higher risk of csPCa. Published version 1008-682X 2023-07-25T05:03:18Z 2023-07-25T05:03:18Z 2023 Journal Article Leow, J. J., Koh, S. H., Chow, M. W. L., Loke, W., Salada, R., Hong, S. K., Yeow, Y., Lee, C. H., Tan, C. H. & Tan, T. W. (2023). Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?. Asian Journal of Andrology, 25(1), 43-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja2021128 1008-682X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576 10.4103/aja2021128 35488666 2-s2.0-85146139882 1 25 43 49 en Asian Journal of Andrology © The Author(s) (2022). This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Medicine
Prostate Cancer
Uronav
spellingShingle Science::Medicine
Prostate Cancer
Uronav
Leow, Jeffrey J.
Koh, Soon Hock
Chow, Marcus W. L.
Loke, Wayren
Salada, Rolando
Hong, Seok Kwan
Yeow, Yuyi
Lee, Chau Hung
Tan, Cher Heng
Tan, Teck Wei
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion who underwent targeted and/or systematic biopsies from May 2016 to May 2020. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as any Gleason grade group ≥2 cancer. Of 545 patients who underwent MRI fusion-targeted biopsy, 222 (40.7%) were biopsy naïve, 247 (45.3%) had previous prostate biopsy(s), and 76 (13.9%) had known prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. Prostate cancer was more commonly found in biopsy-naïve men (63.5%) and those on active surveillance (68.4%) compared to those who had previous biopsies (35.2%; both P < 0.001). Systematic biopsies provided an incremental 10.4% detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve patients, versus an incremental 2.4% among those who had prior negative biopsies. Multivariable regression found age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, P = 0.03), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density ≥0.15 ng ml-2 (OR = 3.24, P < 0.001), prostate health index (PHI) ≥35 (OR = 2.43, P = 0.006), higher PI-RADS score (vs PI-RADS 3; OR = 4.59 for PI-RADS 4, and OR = 9.91 for PI-RADS 5; both P < 0.001) and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 (OR = 5.26, P = 0.013) were significantly associated with csPCa detection on targeted biopsy. In conclusion, for men undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies, systematic biopsies should not be omitted given its incremental value to targeted biopsies alone. The factors such as PSA density ≥0.15 ng ml-2, PHI ≥35, higher PI-RADS score, and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 can help identify men at higher risk of csPCa.
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Leow, Jeffrey J.
Koh, Soon Hock
Chow, Marcus W. L.
Loke, Wayren
Salada, Rolando
Hong, Seok Kwan
Yeow, Yuyi
Lee, Chau Hung
Tan, Cher Heng
Tan, Teck Wei
format Article
author Leow, Jeffrey J.
Koh, Soon Hock
Chow, Marcus W. L.
Loke, Wayren
Salada, Rolando
Hong, Seok Kwan
Yeow, Yuyi
Lee, Chau Hung
Tan, Cher Heng
Tan, Teck Wei
author_sort Leow, Jeffrey J.
title Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
title_short Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
title_full Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
title_fullStr Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
title_full_unstemmed Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
title_sort can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing mri fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576
_version_ 1773551227546632192