Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least on...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-169576 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1695762023-07-30T15:38:07Z Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? Leow, Jeffrey J. Koh, Soon Hock Chow, Marcus W. L. Loke, Wayren Salada, Rolando Hong, Seok Kwan Yeow, Yuyi Lee, Chau Hung Tan, Cher Heng Tan, Teck Wei Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Prostate Cancer Uronav Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion who underwent targeted and/or systematic biopsies from May 2016 to May 2020. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as any Gleason grade group ≥2 cancer. Of 545 patients who underwent MRI fusion-targeted biopsy, 222 (40.7%) were biopsy naïve, 247 (45.3%) had previous prostate biopsy(s), and 76 (13.9%) had known prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. Prostate cancer was more commonly found in biopsy-naïve men (63.5%) and those on active surveillance (68.4%) compared to those who had previous biopsies (35.2%; both P < 0.001). Systematic biopsies provided an incremental 10.4% detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve patients, versus an incremental 2.4% among those who had prior negative biopsies. Multivariable regression found age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, P = 0.03), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density ≥0.15 ng ml-2 (OR = 3.24, P < 0.001), prostate health index (PHI) ≥35 (OR = 2.43, P = 0.006), higher PI-RADS score (vs PI-RADS 3; OR = 4.59 for PI-RADS 4, and OR = 9.91 for PI-RADS 5; both P < 0.001) and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 (OR = 5.26, P = 0.013) were significantly associated with csPCa detection on targeted biopsy. In conclusion, for men undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies, systematic biopsies should not be omitted given its incremental value to targeted biopsies alone. The factors such as PSA density ≥0.15 ng ml-2, PHI ≥35, higher PI-RADS score, and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 can help identify men at higher risk of csPCa. Published version 1008-682X 2023-07-25T05:03:18Z 2023-07-25T05:03:18Z 2023 Journal Article Leow, J. J., Koh, S. H., Chow, M. W. L., Loke, W., Salada, R., Hong, S. K., Yeow, Y., Lee, C. H., Tan, C. H. & Tan, T. W. (2023). Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?. Asian Journal of Andrology, 25(1), 43-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja2021128 1008-682X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576 10.4103/aja2021128 35488666 2-s2.0-85146139882 1 25 43 49 en Asian Journal of Andrology © The Author(s) (2022). This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::Medicine Prostate Cancer Uronav |
spellingShingle |
Science::Medicine Prostate Cancer Uronav Leow, Jeffrey J. Koh, Soon Hock Chow, Marcus W. L. Loke, Wayren Salada, Rolando Hong, Seok Kwan Yeow, Yuyi Lee, Chau Hung Tan, Cher Heng Tan, Teck Wei Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
description |
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is the recommended investigation in men with suspicious lesion(s) on MRI. The role of concurrent systematic in addition to targeted biopsies is currently unclear. Using our prospectively maintained database, we identified men with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion who underwent targeted and/or systematic biopsies from May 2016 to May 2020. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as any Gleason grade group ≥2 cancer. Of 545 patients who underwent MRI fusion-targeted biopsy, 222 (40.7%) were biopsy naïve, 247 (45.3%) had previous prostate biopsy(s), and 76 (13.9%) had known prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. Prostate cancer was more commonly found in biopsy-naïve men (63.5%) and those on active surveillance (68.4%) compared to those who had previous biopsies (35.2%; both P < 0.001). Systematic biopsies provided an incremental 10.4% detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve patients, versus an incremental 2.4% among those who had prior negative biopsies. Multivariable regression found age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, P = 0.03), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density ≥0.15 ng ml-2 (OR = 3.24, P < 0.001), prostate health index (PHI) ≥35 (OR = 2.43, P = 0.006), higher PI-RADS score (vs PI-RADS 3; OR = 4.59 for PI-RADS 4, and OR = 9.91 for PI-RADS 5; both P < 0.001) and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 (OR = 5.26, P = 0.013) were significantly associated with csPCa detection on targeted biopsy. In conclusion, for men undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies, systematic biopsies should not be omitted given its incremental value to targeted biopsies alone. The factors such as PSA density ≥0.15 ng ml-2, PHI ≥35, higher PI-RADS score, and target lesion volume-to-prostate volume ratio ≥0.10 can help identify men at higher risk of csPCa. |
author2 |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) |
author_facet |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Leow, Jeffrey J. Koh, Soon Hock Chow, Marcus W. L. Loke, Wayren Salada, Rolando Hong, Seok Kwan Yeow, Yuyi Lee, Chau Hung Tan, Cher Heng Tan, Teck Wei |
format |
Article |
author |
Leow, Jeffrey J. Koh, Soon Hock Chow, Marcus W. L. Loke, Wayren Salada, Rolando Hong, Seok Kwan Yeow, Yuyi Lee, Chau Hung Tan, Cher Heng Tan, Teck Wei |
author_sort |
Leow, Jeffrey J. |
title |
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
title_short |
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
title_full |
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
title_fullStr |
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
title_sort |
can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing mri fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169576 |
_version_ |
1773551227546632192 |