What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis
The first, sometimes the only, selection tool for entry into undergraduate medicine is prior educational attainment (PEA). This is often further specified to include certain subjects, for example, biology is a prerequisite for entry into medicine in many Asian countries. However, there seems no clea...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170407 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-170407 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1704072023-09-11T07:32:43Z What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis Saravanan, Rathi Chandrasekaran, Ramya Cleland, Jennifer Anne Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Student Performance Medical School Admissions The first, sometimes the only, selection tool for entry into undergraduate medicine is prior educational attainment (PEA). This is often further specified to include certain subjects, for example, biology is a prerequisite for entry into medicine in many Asian countries. However, there seems no clear evidence base for this prerequisite. Our aim, therefore, was to carry out a retrospective quantitative study comparing the performances of five cohorts of students (2015-2019 entry; n = 588) with and without biology PEA in Years 1 and 2 Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) integrated written assessments (n = 3) and anatomy practical examinations (APE) (n = 5). The study was conducted at one of Singapore's three medical schools. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U with p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. There were no significant differences in performance on any Years 1 or 2 integrated written assessments. Similarly, in one of the APE, a significant difference was found for one cohort (academic year [AY] 2015-2016) out of five assessments. These results suggest that having a prior biology qualification does not make a difference in assessment performance in the early years of medical school. This information may help stakeholders and admissions committees decide whether biology is required for medical school entrance. 2023-09-11T07:32:43Z 2023-09-11T07:32:43Z 2023 Journal Article Saravanan, R., Chandrasekaran, R., Cleland, J. A. & Mogali, S. R. (2023). What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis. Medical Teacher, 45(5), 510-515. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2140035 0142-159X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170407 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2140035 36315620 2-s2.0-85141213406 5 45 510 515 en Medical Teacher © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::Medicine Student Performance Medical School Admissions |
spellingShingle |
Science::Medicine Student Performance Medical School Admissions Saravanan, Rathi Chandrasekaran, Ramya Cleland, Jennifer Anne Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
description |
The first, sometimes the only, selection tool for entry into undergraduate medicine is prior educational attainment (PEA). This is often further specified to include certain subjects, for example, biology is a prerequisite for entry into medicine in many Asian countries. However, there seems no clear evidence base for this prerequisite. Our aim, therefore, was to carry out a retrospective quantitative study comparing the performances of five cohorts of students (2015-2019 entry; n = 588) with and without biology PEA in Years 1 and 2 Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) integrated written assessments (n = 3) and anatomy practical examinations (APE) (n = 5). The study was conducted at one of Singapore's three medical schools. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U with p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. There were no significant differences in performance on any Years 1 or 2 integrated written assessments. Similarly, in one of the APE, a significant difference was found for one cohort (academic year [AY] 2015-2016) out of five assessments. These results suggest that having a prior biology qualification does not make a difference in assessment performance in the early years of medical school. This information may help stakeholders and admissions committees decide whether biology is required for medical school entrance. |
author2 |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) |
author_facet |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Saravanan, Rathi Chandrasekaran, Ramya Cleland, Jennifer Anne Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy |
format |
Article |
author |
Saravanan, Rathi Chandrasekaran, Ramya Cleland, Jennifer Anne Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy |
author_sort |
Saravanan, Rathi |
title |
What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
title_short |
What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
title_full |
What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr |
What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? A retrospective analysis |
title_sort |
what is the evidence for biology as the 'heart of eligibility' to study medicine? a retrospective analysis |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170407 |
_version_ |
1779156450397913088 |