Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care

PURPOSE: Genetic testing has clinical utility in the management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the increased likelihood of encountering a variant of uncertain significance in individuals of non- European descent such as Asians may be challenging to both clinicians and patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiang, Jianbang, Chia, Tze Hao, Yuen, Jeanette, Shaw, Tarryn, Li, Shao-Tzu, Nur Diana Binte Ishak, Chew, Ee Ling, Chong, Siao Ting, Chan, Sock Hoai, Ngeow, Joanne
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170423
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-170423
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1704232023-09-12T01:58:59Z Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care Chiang, Jianbang Chia, Tze Hao Yuen, Jeanette Shaw, Tarryn Li, Shao-Tzu Nur Diana Binte Ishak Chew, Ee Ling Chong, Siao Ting Chan, Sock Hoai Ngeow, Joanne Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) National Cancer Centre Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, A*STAR Science::Medicine Cancer Genetics Retrospective Study PURPOSE: Genetic testing has clinical utility in the management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the increased likelihood of encountering a variant of uncertain significance in individuals of non- European descent such as Asians may be challenging to both clinicians and patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of variant reclassification in an Asian country with variants of uncertain significance reported in cancer predisposition genes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients seen at the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between February 2014 and March 2020 was conducted. The frequency, direction, and time to variant reclassification were evaluated by comparing the reclassified report against the original report. RESULTS: A total of 1,412 variants of uncertain significance were reported in 49.9% (845 of 1,695) of patients. Over 6 years, 6.7% (94 of 1,412) of variants were reclassified. Most variants of uncertain significance (94.1%, 80 of 85) were downgraded to benign or likely benign variant, with a smaller proportion of variants of uncertain significance (5.9%, 5 of 85) upgraded to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Actionable variants of uncertain significance upgrades and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant downgrades, which resulted in management changes, happened in 31.0% (39 of 126) of patients. The median and mean time taken for reclassification were 1 and 1.62 year(s), respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a clinical guideline to standardize management of patients reported to have variants of uncertain significance. Management should be based on the patient's personal history, family history, and variant interpretation. For clinically relevant or suspicious variants of uncertain significance, follow-up is recommended every 2 years, as actionable reclassifications may happen during this period. Ministry of Health (MOH) National Medical Research Council (NMRC) National Research Foundation (NRF) Supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Clinical Scientist Award (NMRC/CSA-INV/0017/2017) and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council. This project was partially funded by NCC Research Fund, NCC Cancer Fund, and Terry Fox supporting funds. J.N. was funded by the National Medical Research Council Singapore and also received research funding from AstraZeneca. 2023-09-12T01:58:58Z 2023-09-12T01:58:58Z 2021 Journal Article Chiang, J., Chia, T. H., Yuen, J., Shaw, T., Li, S., Nur Diana Binte Ishak, Chew, E. L., Chong, S. T., Chan, S. H. & Ngeow, J. (2021). Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care. JCO Precision Oncology, 5(5), 577-584. https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00399 2473-4284 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170423 10.1200/PO.20.00399 34994607 2-s2.0-85120181921 5 5 577 584 en NMRC/CSA-INV/0017/2017 JCO Precision Oncology © 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Medicine
Cancer Genetics
Retrospective Study
spellingShingle Science::Medicine
Cancer Genetics
Retrospective Study
Chiang, Jianbang
Chia, Tze Hao
Yuen, Jeanette
Shaw, Tarryn
Li, Shao-Tzu
Nur Diana Binte Ishak
Chew, Ee Ling
Chong, Siao Ting
Chan, Sock Hoai
Ngeow, Joanne
Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
description PURPOSE: Genetic testing has clinical utility in the management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the increased likelihood of encountering a variant of uncertain significance in individuals of non- European descent such as Asians may be challenging to both clinicians and patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of variant reclassification in an Asian country with variants of uncertain significance reported in cancer predisposition genes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients seen at the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between February 2014 and March 2020 was conducted. The frequency, direction, and time to variant reclassification were evaluated by comparing the reclassified report against the original report. RESULTS: A total of 1,412 variants of uncertain significance were reported in 49.9% (845 of 1,695) of patients. Over 6 years, 6.7% (94 of 1,412) of variants were reclassified. Most variants of uncertain significance (94.1%, 80 of 85) were downgraded to benign or likely benign variant, with a smaller proportion of variants of uncertain significance (5.9%, 5 of 85) upgraded to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Actionable variants of uncertain significance upgrades and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant downgrades, which resulted in management changes, happened in 31.0% (39 of 126) of patients. The median and mean time taken for reclassification were 1 and 1.62 year(s), respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a clinical guideline to standardize management of patients reported to have variants of uncertain significance. Management should be based on the patient's personal history, family history, and variant interpretation. For clinically relevant or suspicious variants of uncertain significance, follow-up is recommended every 2 years, as actionable reclassifications may happen during this period.
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Chiang, Jianbang
Chia, Tze Hao
Yuen, Jeanette
Shaw, Tarryn
Li, Shao-Tzu
Nur Diana Binte Ishak
Chew, Ee Ling
Chong, Siao Ting
Chan, Sock Hoai
Ngeow, Joanne
format Article
author Chiang, Jianbang
Chia, Tze Hao
Yuen, Jeanette
Shaw, Tarryn
Li, Shao-Tzu
Nur Diana Binte Ishak
Chew, Ee Ling
Chong, Siao Ting
Chan, Sock Hoai
Ngeow, Joanne
author_sort Chiang, Jianbang
title Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
title_short Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
title_full Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
title_fullStr Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
title_full_unstemmed Impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
title_sort impact of variant reclassification in cancer predisposition genes on clinical care
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170423
_version_ 1779156360681750528