An agent-based approach for air traffic conflict resolution in a flow-centric airspace
The air traffic control paradigm is shifting from sector-based operations to flow-centric approaches to address the scalability limitations of geographically-bound air traffic sectors and to meet the growing demands of air traffic. These future concepts of operations differ from traditional air...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/170973 https://2023.ieee-itsc.org/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The air traffic control paradigm is shifting from
sector-based operations to flow-centric approaches to address
the scalability limitations of geographically-bound air traffic
sectors and to meet the growing demands of air traffic.
These future concepts of operations differ from traditional
air traffic operations, especially in maintaining safe separation
between flights. Flow-centric operations are characterized by
maintaining safe separation between traffic flows (both interflow as well as intra-flow), in contrast to current standards of
maintaining separation between pairs of aircraft. This paper
proposes a novel approach for resolving air traffic conflicts
in flow-centric en-route airspace by employing a combination
of a model-free Deep Reinforcement Learning policy and a
self-stabilizing graph structure. The problem is formulated
as a sequential decision-making task in a large action space,
requiring a series of decisions to be made over time to resolve
potential conflicts at both the inter-flow and intra-flow levels,
while adhering to the flow plans and subsequently reaching
the destination. Model performance is evaluated by measuring
the frequency of safe separations achieved and the efficiency
of the maneuvers (deviation from the flow plans). Despite the
intra-flow and inter-flow speed uncertainties and the dynamic
behavior of the shape of the flows due to variations in the
number of aircraft in each flow in every scenario, the proposed
approach achieves safe separations for 100% of the scenarios
evaluated. The results also demonstrate that despite the induced
delay due to conflict resolution maneuvers, the flows closely
adhere to their original flow plan. This approach can be used
to develop intelligent conflict resolution advisory tools in a flowcentric airspace paradigm. |
---|