COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a global health and political crisis like no other in recent history. As ground zero of the virus outbreak, significant criticism and blame have been directed at China for covering up the outbreak. Yet a systematic assessment of China's responses to internation...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171097 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-171097 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1710972023-10-15T15:30:23Z COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices Loh, Dylan Ming Hui Loke, Beverley School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Political science Blame Management COVID-19 The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a global health and political crisis like no other in recent history. As ground zero of the virus outbreak, significant criticism and blame have been directed at China for covering up the outbreak. Yet a systematic assessment of China's responses to international opprobrium of its pandemic measures has been largely lacking in the literature. Drawing on the concept of "blame"from public administration, this article seeks to fill this gap by investigating China's COVID-19 crisis and blame (mis)management practices. We make two key contributions in this article. First, we highlight how Beijing engaged in the politics of blame and outline three modes (defensive, aggressive and proactive benevolence) of its blame management practices. Second, we suggest that China sought to articulate and refine its identity during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing insights into a China that is increasingly assertive yet vulnerable to reputational damage. We contend that China's efforts to counter international opprobrium and shift strategic narratives speak directly to issues of autocratic legitimation and its conceived "responsible great power"identity, with greater success among domestic rather than global audiences. Published version 2023-10-13T01:40:01Z 2023-10-13T01:40:01Z 2023 Journal Article Loh, D. M. H. & Loke, B. (2023). COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices. The China Quarterly. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023000796 0305-7410 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171097 10.1017/S0305741023000796 2-s2.0-85168924385 en The China Quarterly © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Political science Blame Management COVID-19 |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Political science Blame Management COVID-19 Loh, Dylan Ming Hui Loke, Beverley COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a global health and political crisis like no other in recent history. As ground zero of the virus outbreak, significant criticism and blame have been directed at China for covering up the outbreak. Yet a systematic assessment of China's responses to international opprobrium of its pandemic measures has been largely lacking in the literature. Drawing on the concept of "blame"from public administration, this article seeks to fill this gap by investigating China's COVID-19 crisis and blame (mis)management practices. We make two key contributions in this article. First, we highlight how Beijing engaged in the politics of blame and outline three modes (defensive, aggressive and proactive benevolence) of its blame management practices. Second, we suggest that China sought to articulate and refine its identity during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing insights into a China that is increasingly assertive yet vulnerable to reputational damage. We contend that China's efforts to counter international opprobrium and shift strategic narratives speak directly to issues of autocratic legitimation and its conceived "responsible great power"identity, with greater success among domestic rather than global audiences. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Loh, Dylan Ming Hui Loke, Beverley |
format |
Article |
author |
Loh, Dylan Ming Hui Loke, Beverley |
author_sort |
Loh, Dylan Ming Hui |
title |
COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
title_short |
COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
title_full |
COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
title_fullStr |
COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
COVID-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing China's crisis (mis)management practices |
title_sort |
covid-19 and the international politics of blame: assessing china's crisis (mis)management practices |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171097 |
_version_ |
1781793757396467712 |