Social bias, not time bias
People seem to have pure time preferences about trade-offs concerning their own pleasures and pains, and such preferences contribute to estimates of people's individual time discount rate. Do pure time preferences also matter to interpersonal welfare trade-offs, including those concerning the w...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171819 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-171819 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1718192023-11-09T01:41:27Z Social bias, not time bias Greene, Preston School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Time Bias Time Discounting People seem to have pure time preferences about trade-offs concerning their own pleasures and pains, and such preferences contribute to estimates of people's individual time discount rate. Do pure time preferences also matter to interpersonal welfare trade-offs, including those concerning the welfare of future generations? Most importantly, should the intergenerational time discount rate include a pure time preference? Descriptivists claim that the intergenerational discount rate should reflect actual people's revealed preferences, and thus it should include a pure time preference. Prescriptivists claim that the intergenerational discount rate should be based on moral analysis, and thus they (often) claim that the rate of pure time preference should be zero. I argue that regardless of which view is correct, a focus on pure time preference is misplaced. First, the most plausible interpretation of descriptive preferences for intergenerational trade-offs is that people are socially biased and not time biased. Second, social bias is superior to time bias as a prescriptive reason to discount the welfare of future people. Third, recent advances in measuring social bias as a social discount rate make social bias a viable replacement for time bias in economic analyses of intergenerational welfare trade-offs. Ministry of Education (MOE) This work was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (grant number RG134/19(NS)). 2023-11-09T01:41:27Z 2023-11-09T01:41:27Z 2023 Journal Article Greene, P. (2023). Social bias, not time bias. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470594X231178506 1470-594X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171819 10.1177/1470594X231178506 2-s2.0-85162962350 en RG134/19(NS) Politics, Philosophy & Economics © 2023 The Author(s). All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Philosophy Time Bias Time Discounting |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Philosophy Time Bias Time Discounting Greene, Preston Social bias, not time bias |
description |
People seem to have pure time preferences about trade-offs concerning their own pleasures and pains, and such preferences contribute to estimates of people's individual time discount rate. Do pure time preferences also matter to interpersonal welfare trade-offs, including those concerning the welfare of future generations? Most importantly, should the intergenerational time discount rate include a pure time preference? Descriptivists claim that the intergenerational discount rate should reflect actual people's revealed preferences, and thus it should include a pure time preference. Prescriptivists claim that the intergenerational discount rate should be based on moral analysis, and thus they (often) claim that the rate of pure time preference should be zero. I argue that regardless of which view is correct, a focus on pure time preference is misplaced. First, the most plausible interpretation of descriptive preferences for intergenerational trade-offs is that people are socially biased and not time biased. Second, social bias is superior to time bias as a prescriptive reason to discount the welfare of future people. Third, recent advances in measuring social bias as a social discount rate make social bias a viable replacement for time bias in economic analyses of intergenerational welfare trade-offs. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Greene, Preston |
format |
Article |
author |
Greene, Preston |
author_sort |
Greene, Preston |
title |
Social bias, not time bias |
title_short |
Social bias, not time bias |
title_full |
Social bias, not time bias |
title_fullStr |
Social bias, not time bias |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social bias, not time bias |
title_sort |
social bias, not time bias |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171819 |
_version_ |
1783955552161759232 |