Comparison of semi-supervised learning algorithms

In this report, we conducted image classification experiments in a semi-supervised setting using three datasets of various sizes and content, CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and EuroSAT, with only 1000 samples labelled and the remaining as unlabelled for training. The performance and training duration of three SS...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Teo, Sheng Huai
مؤلفون آخرون: Li Boyang
التنسيق: Final Year Project
اللغة:English
منشور في: Nanyang Technological University 2023
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172003
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
المؤسسة: Nanyang Technological University
اللغة: English
الوصف
الملخص:In this report, we conducted image classification experiments in a semi-supervised setting using three datasets of various sizes and content, CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and EuroSAT, with only 1000 samples labelled and the remaining as unlabelled for training. The performance and training duration of three SSL algorithms, MixMatch, FixMatch and FlexMatch, were compared. For CIFAR10 and EuroSAT, MixMatch achieved the highest accuracy of 95.8% and 93.4% respectively. Despite having the best performance for both datasets, MixMatch took most time to train, with an average of 27.5% longer than FixMatch, which has the shortest training duration. For CIFAR100, FixMatch obtained the best results for all four metrics obtained. FlexMatch was the next best, with an accuracy of 73.2%, and the other metrics having a difference of roughly 2.5% compared to FixMatch.