Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment

Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO therefore antici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad, Tominaga, Koji, Chua, Xinyi, Duong, Vu N., Itoh, Eri, Schultz, Michael
Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-172633
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1726332023-12-23T16:47:27Z Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad Tominaga, Koji Chua, Xinyi Duong, Vu N. Itoh, Eri Schultz, Michael School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 2023 IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) Air Traffic Management Research Institute Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation Air Traffic Management Flow-Centric Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO therefore anticipates that two aircraft, which are controlled by two respective air traffic control officers (ATCOs), may coexist in the same volume of airspace. FCO’s requirements or enablers in terms of technical preparedness are not established. FOC might provide elasticity in capacity by creating more flows by splitting the incoming flows, as many as needed. It might be able to split the incoming traffic to achieve greater capacity, compared to the capacity level attained by splitting area sectors. In addition, it might offer the Capacityon-Demand capability; in a low traffic hour or day, an area control centre shall roster fewer ATCOs, and in a high traffic hour or day, more ATCOs. Through the conduct of Human-inthe-Loop simulation involving a total of 6 ATCOs from Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, across a 11-day period, qualitative feedback was solicited from the ATCOs. Tokenised comments are categorised into 3 sets: safety concerns, concept design parameters, and Human-Machine Interface. Key takeaways include: the need to understand further into the difficulty level of different crossing and merging and not simply have a uniform perceived difficulty or weight for such scenarios, the importance of considering the difficulty/complexity factor rather than the volume of traffic when dealing with assignment strategy and the importance of considering human-machine interfaces dealing with zoom level or secondary windows. Based on this simulation study, we discuss possibilities for future and follow up studies. The most important appears to be creating ideal air traffic flow for ATCOs, which minimises air traffic inferences at air traffic hot-spot areas, in order to realise FCO under increasing air traffic demands. For this purpose, key ideas of our future works are managing time-varying air traffic at the hot-spots based on queue-based approaches, development of geometric algorithms for ergonomic spatially and temporally dynamic area of responsibility for ATCOs, and studies on FCO-specific human factors and ATCO-to-ATCO coordination mechanisms. Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) National Research Foundation (NRF) Submitted/Accepted version This study is funded by National Research Foundation Singapore, under the Aviation Transformation Programme. 2023-12-21T02:46:31Z 2023-12-21T02:46:31Z 2023 Conference Paper Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad, Tominaga, K., Chua, X., Duong, V. N., Itoh, E. & Schultz, M. (2023). Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment. 2023 IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168 979-8-3503-3357-2 2155-7209 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633 10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168 en © 2023 IEEE. All rights reserved. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the copyright holder. The Version of Record is available online at http://doi.org/10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation
Air Traffic Management
Flow-Centric
spellingShingle Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation
Air Traffic Management
Flow-Centric
Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad
Tominaga, Koji
Chua, Xinyi
Duong, Vu N.
Itoh, Eri
Schultz, Michael
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
description Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO therefore anticipates that two aircraft, which are controlled by two respective air traffic control officers (ATCOs), may coexist in the same volume of airspace. FCO’s requirements or enablers in terms of technical preparedness are not established. FOC might provide elasticity in capacity by creating more flows by splitting the incoming flows, as many as needed. It might be able to split the incoming traffic to achieve greater capacity, compared to the capacity level attained by splitting area sectors. In addition, it might offer the Capacityon-Demand capability; in a low traffic hour or day, an area control centre shall roster fewer ATCOs, and in a high traffic hour or day, more ATCOs. Through the conduct of Human-inthe-Loop simulation involving a total of 6 ATCOs from Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, across a 11-day period, qualitative feedback was solicited from the ATCOs. Tokenised comments are categorised into 3 sets: safety concerns, concept design parameters, and Human-Machine Interface. Key takeaways include: the need to understand further into the difficulty level of different crossing and merging and not simply have a uniform perceived difficulty or weight for such scenarios, the importance of considering the difficulty/complexity factor rather than the volume of traffic when dealing with assignment strategy and the importance of considering human-machine interfaces dealing with zoom level or secondary windows. Based on this simulation study, we discuss possibilities for future and follow up studies. The most important appears to be creating ideal air traffic flow for ATCOs, which minimises air traffic inferences at air traffic hot-spot areas, in order to realise FCO under increasing air traffic demands. For this purpose, key ideas of our future works are managing time-varying air traffic at the hot-spots based on queue-based approaches, development of geometric algorithms for ergonomic spatially and temporally dynamic area of responsibility for ATCOs, and studies on FCO-specific human factors and ATCO-to-ATCO coordination mechanisms.
author2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
author_facet School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad
Tominaga, Koji
Chua, Xinyi
Duong, Vu N.
Itoh, Eri
Schultz, Michael
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad
Tominaga, Koji
Chua, Xinyi
Duong, Vu N.
Itoh, Eri
Schultz, Michael
author_sort Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad
title Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
title_short Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
title_full Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
title_fullStr Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
title_full_unstemmed Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
title_sort flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633
_version_ 1787136622017380352