Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment
Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO therefore antici...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-172633 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1726332023-12-23T16:47:27Z Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad Tominaga, Koji Chua, Xinyi Duong, Vu N. Itoh, Eri Schultz, Michael School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 2023 IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) Air Traffic Management Research Institute Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation Air Traffic Management Flow-Centric Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO therefore anticipates that two aircraft, which are controlled by two respective air traffic control officers (ATCOs), may coexist in the same volume of airspace. FCO’s requirements or enablers in terms of technical preparedness are not established. FOC might provide elasticity in capacity by creating more flows by splitting the incoming flows, as many as needed. It might be able to split the incoming traffic to achieve greater capacity, compared to the capacity level attained by splitting area sectors. In addition, it might offer the Capacityon-Demand capability; in a low traffic hour or day, an area control centre shall roster fewer ATCOs, and in a high traffic hour or day, more ATCOs. Through the conduct of Human-inthe-Loop simulation involving a total of 6 ATCOs from Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, across a 11-day period, qualitative feedback was solicited from the ATCOs. Tokenised comments are categorised into 3 sets: safety concerns, concept design parameters, and Human-Machine Interface. Key takeaways include: the need to understand further into the difficulty level of different crossing and merging and not simply have a uniform perceived difficulty or weight for such scenarios, the importance of considering the difficulty/complexity factor rather than the volume of traffic when dealing with assignment strategy and the importance of considering human-machine interfaces dealing with zoom level or secondary windows. Based on this simulation study, we discuss possibilities for future and follow up studies. The most important appears to be creating ideal air traffic flow for ATCOs, which minimises air traffic inferences at air traffic hot-spot areas, in order to realise FCO under increasing air traffic demands. For this purpose, key ideas of our future works are managing time-varying air traffic at the hot-spots based on queue-based approaches, development of geometric algorithms for ergonomic spatially and temporally dynamic area of responsibility for ATCOs, and studies on FCO-specific human factors and ATCO-to-ATCO coordination mechanisms. Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) National Research Foundation (NRF) Submitted/Accepted version This study is funded by National Research Foundation Singapore, under the Aviation Transformation Programme. 2023-12-21T02:46:31Z 2023-12-21T02:46:31Z 2023 Conference Paper Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad, Tominaga, K., Chua, X., Duong, V. N., Itoh, E. & Schultz, M. (2023). Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment. 2023 IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168 979-8-3503-3357-2 2155-7209 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633 10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168 en © 2023 IEEE. All rights reserved. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the copyright holder. The Version of Record is available online at http://doi.org/10.1109/DASC58513.2023.10311168. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation Air Traffic Management Flow-Centric |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Aeronautical engineering::Air navigation Air Traffic Management Flow-Centric Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad Tominaga, Koji Chua, Xinyi Duong, Vu N. Itoh, Eri Schultz, Michael Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
description |
Flow-Centric Operations (FCO) is a novel air traffic control concept for the management of
en-route airspace in which controller assignment is determined by grouping factors such as
similarity in trajectory rather than by the physical position of the flight (by area sectors). FCO
therefore anticipates that two aircraft, which are controlled by two respective air traffic
control officers (ATCOs), may coexist in the same volume of airspace. FCO’s requirements
or enablers in terms of technical preparedness are not established. FOC might provide
elasticity in capacity by creating more flows by splitting the incoming flows, as many as
needed. It might be able to split the incoming traffic to achieve greater capacity, compared to
the capacity level attained by splitting area sectors. In addition, it might offer the Capacityon-Demand capability; in a low traffic hour or day, an area control centre shall roster fewer
ATCOs, and in a high traffic hour or day, more ATCOs. Through the conduct of Human-inthe-Loop simulation involving a total of 6 ATCOs from Civil Aviation Authority of
Singapore, across a 11-day period, qualitative feedback was solicited from the ATCOs.
Tokenised comments are categorised into 3 sets: safety concerns, concept design parameters,
and Human-Machine Interface. Key takeaways include: the need to understand further into
the difficulty level of different crossing and merging and not simply have a uniform
perceived difficulty or weight for such scenarios, the importance of considering the
difficulty/complexity factor rather than the volume of traffic when dealing with assignment
strategy and the importance of considering human-machine interfaces dealing with zoom
level or secondary windows. Based on this simulation study, we discuss possibilities for
future and follow up studies. The most important appears to be creating ideal air traffic flow
for ATCOs, which minimises air traffic inferences at air traffic hot-spot areas, in order to
realise FCO under increasing air traffic demands. For this purpose, key ideas of our future
works are managing time-varying air traffic at the hot-spots based on queue-based
approaches, development of geometric algorithms for ergonomic spatially and temporally
dynamic area of responsibility for ATCOs, and studies on FCO-specific human factors and
ATCO-to-ATCO coordination mechanisms. |
author2 |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad Tominaga, Koji Chua, Xinyi Duong, Vu N. Itoh, Eri Schultz, Michael |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad Tominaga, Koji Chua, Xinyi Duong, Vu N. Itoh, Eri Schultz, Michael |
author_sort |
Ahmad Sufian Bin Jumad |
title |
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
title_short |
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
title_full |
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
title_fullStr |
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
title_sort |
flow-centric air traffic control: human in the loop simulation experiment |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172633 |
_version_ |
1787136622017380352 |