Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects
Ren 仁 and li 禮 are important concepts in Confucian philosophy. The relation between ren and li has also been a topic of interest for scholars from ancient times to the present. As David Wong argues, the relation between ren and li may motivate an understanding of social norms and morality that trans...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173001 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-173001 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1730012024-01-20T16:55:58Z Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects Zhang, Jian School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Analects Ren Li Ren 仁 and li 禮 are important concepts in Confucian philosophy. The relation between ren and li has also been a topic of interest for scholars from ancient times to the present. As David Wong argues, the relation between ren and li may motivate an understanding of social norms and morality that transcends cultural boundaries (Wong 2021, x2.2). Many scholars have made several influential contributions to this topic. Generally, they interpret li as a means of attaining ren, and consider li’s role in moral self-cultivation to be one of the core characteristics of Confucian philosophy. This article attempts to subvert this notion. I try to demonstrate, at least in the Analects, that Confucius does not hold the idea that observing li is instrumental to attaining ren. Published version 2024-01-15T05:42:56Z 2024-01-15T05:42:56Z 2023 Journal Article Zhang, J. (2023). Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects. Philosophy East and West, 73(4), 1004-1022. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/PEW.2023.A909974 0031-8221 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173001 10.1353/PEW.2023.A909974 2-s2.0-85176794071 4 73 1004 1022 en Philosophy East and West © 2023 by University of Hawai‘i Press. All rights reserved. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the copyright holder. The Version of Record is available online at http://doi.org/10.1353/PEW.2023.A909974 application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Philosophy Analects Ren Li |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Philosophy Analects Ren Li Zhang, Jian Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
description |
Ren 仁 and li 禮 are important concepts in Confucian philosophy. The relation between ren and li has also been a topic of interest for scholars from ancient times to the present. As David Wong argues, the relation between ren and li may motivate an understanding of social norms and morality that transcends cultural boundaries (Wong 2021, x2.2). Many scholars have made several influential contributions to this topic. Generally, they interpret li as a means of attaining ren, and consider li’s role in moral self-cultivation to be one of the core characteristics of Confucian philosophy. This article attempts to subvert this notion. I try to demonstrate, at least in the Analects, that Confucius does not hold the idea that observing li is instrumental to attaining ren. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Zhang, Jian |
format |
Article |
author |
Zhang, Jian |
author_sort |
Zhang, Jian |
title |
Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
title_short |
Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
title_full |
Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
title_fullStr |
Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why observing Li is not the instrument to attain Ren: on the relation between Ren and Li in the Analects |
title_sort |
why observing li is not the instrument to attain ren: on the relation between ren and li in the analects |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173001 |
_version_ |
1789483162548568064 |