No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect
We study a bus system with a no-boarding policy, where a ‘slow’ bus may disallow passengers from boarding if it meets some criteria. When the no-boarding policy is activated, people waiting to board at the bus stop are given the choices of cooperating or defecting. The people’s heterogeneous behavio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173550 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-173550 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1735502024-02-19T15:35:01Z No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect Saw, Vee-Liem Chew, Lock Yue School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research Centre Complexity Institute Physics Bus bunching No-boarding buses Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality Minority game Multi-agent system Evolutionary game theory We study a bus system with a no-boarding policy, where a ‘slow’ bus may disallow passengers from boarding if it meets some criteria. When the no-boarding policy is activated, people waiting to board at the bus stop are given the choices of cooperating or defecting. The people’s heterogeneous behaviours are modelled by inductive reasoning and bounded rationality, inspired by the El Farol problem and the minority game. In defecting the no-boarding policy, instead of the minority group being the winning group, we investigate several scenarios where defectors win if the number of defectors does not exceed the maximum number of allowed defectors but lose otherwise. Contrary to the classical minority game which has N agents repeatedly playing amongst themselves, many real-world situations like boarding a bus involves only a subset of agents who ‘play each round’, with different subsets playing at different rounds. We find for such realistic situations, there is no phase transition with no herding behaviour when the usual control paramater 2m/N is small. The absence of the herding behaviour assures feasible and sustainable implementation of the no-boarding policy with allowance for defections, without leading to bus bunching. Nanyang Technological University Published version This work was supported by the Joint WASP/NTU Programme (Project No. M4082189) and the DSAIR@NTU Grant (Project No. M4082418). 2024-02-14T02:54:35Z 2024-02-14T02:54:35Z 2020 Journal Article Saw, V. & Chew, L. Y. (2020). No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 1(1), 015005-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ab4af5 2632-072X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173550 10.1088/2632-072X/ab4af5 2-s2.0-85091997230 1 1 015005 en M4082189 M4082418 Journal of Physics: Complexity © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Physics Bus bunching No-boarding buses Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality Minority game Multi-agent system Evolutionary game theory |
spellingShingle |
Physics Bus bunching No-boarding buses Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality Minority game Multi-agent system Evolutionary game theory Saw, Vee-Liem Chew, Lock Yue No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
description |
We study a bus system with a no-boarding policy, where a ‘slow’ bus may disallow passengers from boarding if it meets some criteria. When the no-boarding policy is activated, people waiting to board at the bus stop are given the choices of cooperating or defecting. The people’s heterogeneous behaviours are modelled by inductive reasoning and bounded rationality, inspired by the El Farol problem and the minority game. In defecting the no-boarding policy, instead of the minority group being the winning group, we investigate several scenarios where defectors win if the number of defectors does not exceed the maximum number of allowed defectors but lose otherwise. Contrary to the classical minority game which has N agents repeatedly playing amongst themselves, many real-world situations like boarding a bus involves only a subset of agents who ‘play each round’, with different subsets playing at different rounds. We find for such realistic situations, there is no phase transition with no herding behaviour when the usual control paramater 2m/N is small. The absence of the herding behaviour assures feasible and sustainable implementation of the no-boarding policy with allowance for defections, without leading to bus bunching. |
author2 |
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Saw, Vee-Liem Chew, Lock Yue |
format |
Article |
author |
Saw, Vee-Liem Chew, Lock Yue |
author_sort |
Saw, Vee-Liem |
title |
No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
title_short |
No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
title_full |
No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
title_fullStr |
No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
title_full_unstemmed |
No-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
title_sort |
no-boarding buses: agents allowed to cooperate or defect |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/173550 |
_version_ |
1794549372069871616 |