Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies?
Privacy breaches and online frauds are grave concerns in pervasive computing. Device identification is the first line of defense to detect and stop fraud. Conventional device authentication schemes using software addresses as identities or static pre-programmed secret keys are vulnerable to tamperin...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174141 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-174141 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1741412024-03-22T15:41:13Z Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? Zhang, Junqing Chang, Chip Hong Gu, Chongya Hanzo, Lajos School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Engineering Internet of Things Security Privacy breaches and online frauds are grave concerns in pervasive computing. Device identification is the first line of defense to detect and stop fraud. Conventional device authentication schemes using software addresses as identities or static pre-programmed secret keys are vulnerable to tampering and memory attacks. This article reviews two emerging lightweight hardware-oriented solutions to avoid these problems, namely radio frequency fingerprint (RFF) identification and physical unclonable function (PUF) authentication. Their operating principles and protocols are first introduced, followed by a scrutiny of their common and distinctive features, and a discussion of the stumbling blocks in the way of their market adoption. Finally, we envisage a combined mutual authentication and key establishment scheme to shed light on their synergy. Ministry of Education (MOE) Submitted/Accepted version The work of J. Zhang was supported by Royal Society Research Grants under grant ID RGS/R1/191241 and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant ID EP/V027697/1. The work of C. H. Chang was supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its AcRF Tier 2 Award No. MOE-T2EP50220-0003. C. Gu would like to acknowledge the funding of the Royal Society Research Grant IEC/NSFC/211024, the EPSRC EP/N508664/-CSIT2, and the EPSRC Quantum Communications Hub (EP/ T001011/1). L. Hanzo would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council projects EP/P034284/1 and EP/P003990/1 (COALESCE) as well as of the European Research Council’s Advanced Fellow Grant QuantCom (Grant No. 789028). 2024-03-18T06:12:08Z 2024-03-18T06:12:08Z 2022 Journal Article Zhang, J., Chang, C. H., Gu, C. & Hanzo, L. (2022). Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies?. IEEE Network, 36(6), 68-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MNET.107.2100372 0890-8044 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174141 10.1109/MNET.107.2100372 2-s2.0-85135753503 6 36 68 75 en MOE-T2EP50220-0003 IEEE Network © 2022 IEEE. All rights reserved. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the copyright holder. The Version of Record is available online at http://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.107.2100372. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering Internet of Things Security |
spellingShingle |
Engineering Internet of Things Security Zhang, Junqing Chang, Chip Hong Gu, Chongya Hanzo, Lajos Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
description |
Privacy breaches and online frauds are grave concerns in pervasive computing. Device identification is the first line of defense to detect and stop fraud. Conventional device authentication schemes using software addresses as identities or static pre-programmed secret keys are vulnerable to tampering and memory attacks. This article reviews two emerging lightweight hardware-oriented solutions to avoid these problems, namely radio frequency fingerprint (RFF) identification and physical unclonable function (PUF) authentication. Their operating principles and protocols are first introduced, followed by a scrutiny of their common and distinctive features, and a discussion of the stumbling blocks in the way of their market adoption. Finally, we envisage a combined mutual authentication and key establishment scheme to shed light on their synergy. |
author2 |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Zhang, Junqing Chang, Chip Hong Gu, Chongya Hanzo, Lajos |
format |
Article |
author |
Zhang, Junqing Chang, Chip Hong Gu, Chongya Hanzo, Lajos |
author_sort |
Zhang, Junqing |
title |
Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
title_short |
Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
title_full |
Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
title_fullStr |
Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
title_sort |
radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors, or allies? |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174141 |
_version_ |
1794549460496285696 |