British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage

Energy storage systems (ESSs) are a potential solution to the rising issues of electricity price volatility and curtailment of British wind energy. This study performs an extensive and knowledge graph supported investigation into 47 potential wind farm ESS co-location sites. While all ESSs achieved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atherton, John, Akroyd, Jethro, Farazi, Feroz, Mosbach, Sebastian, Lim, Mei Qi, Kraft, Markus
Other Authors: School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174320
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-174320
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1743202024-03-26T04:57:29Z British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage Atherton, John Akroyd, Jethro Farazi, Feroz Mosbach, Sebastian Lim, Mei Qi Kraft, Markus School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore, CARES Ltd. Earth and Environmental Sciences Electricity price volatilities Offshore winds Energy storage systems (ESSs) are a potential solution to the rising issues of electricity price volatility and curtailment of British wind energy. This study performs an extensive and knowledge graph supported investigation into 47 potential wind farm ESS co-location sites. While all ESSs achieved payback due primarily to price arbitrage, results indicate English/Welsh sites (typically with offshore wind) had quicker payback times owing to higher capacity factors presenting more opportunistic charging times. Conversely, while batteries co-located with Scottish wind farms attained slower payback times, they accomplished greater curtailment reductions, which could be used to displace marginal selling from generally fossil fuelled sources. National Research Foundation (NRF) Published version This research was supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme. Part of this work was also supported by Towards Turing 2.0 under the EPSRC Grant EP/W037211/1. The authors would further like to thank and acknowledge the financial support provided by the Cambridge Trust. M. Kraft gratefully acknowledges the support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. 2024-03-26T04:57:29Z 2024-03-26T04:57:29Z 2023 Journal Article Atherton, J., Akroyd, J., Farazi, F., Mosbach, S., Lim, M. Q. & Kraft, M. (2023). British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage. Energy & Environmental Science, 16(9), 4020-4040. https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3ee01355c 1754-5692 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174320 10.1039/d3ee01355c 2-s2.0-85168824266 9 16 4020 4040 en Energy & Environmental Science © The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Earth and Environmental Sciences
Electricity price volatilities
Offshore winds
spellingShingle Earth and Environmental Sciences
Electricity price volatilities
Offshore winds
Atherton, John
Akroyd, Jethro
Farazi, Feroz
Mosbach, Sebastian
Lim, Mei Qi
Kraft, Markus
British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
description Energy storage systems (ESSs) are a potential solution to the rising issues of electricity price volatility and curtailment of British wind energy. This study performs an extensive and knowledge graph supported investigation into 47 potential wind farm ESS co-location sites. While all ESSs achieved payback due primarily to price arbitrage, results indicate English/Welsh sites (typically with offshore wind) had quicker payback times owing to higher capacity factors presenting more opportunistic charging times. Conversely, while batteries co-located with Scottish wind farms attained slower payback times, they accomplished greater curtailment reductions, which could be used to displace marginal selling from generally fossil fuelled sources.
author2 School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
author_facet School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
Atherton, John
Akroyd, Jethro
Farazi, Feroz
Mosbach, Sebastian
Lim, Mei Qi
Kraft, Markus
format Article
author Atherton, John
Akroyd, Jethro
Farazi, Feroz
Mosbach, Sebastian
Lim, Mei Qi
Kraft, Markus
author_sort Atherton, John
title British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
title_short British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
title_full British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
title_fullStr British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
title_full_unstemmed British wind farm ESS attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
title_sort british wind farm ess attachments: curtailment reduction vs. price arbitrage
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174320
_version_ 1795302098409095168