Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA

This study develops a new DEA approach to incorporate such market-level information (i.e., average weights over firms) to create a composite corporate social performance (CSP) measure. The new model addresses the challenge that stakeholder expectations—expressed as the CSP weights of different CSP d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Chien-Ming, Li, Dan.
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-175780
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1757802024-05-06T08:14:55Z Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA Chen, Chien-Ming Li, Dan. Nanyang Business School Business and Management Corporate social performance Data envelopment analysis This study develops a new DEA approach to incorporate such market-level information (i.e., average weights over firms) to create a composite corporate social performance (CSP) measure. The new model addresses the challenge that stakeholder expectations—expressed as the CSP weights of different CSP dimensions—are usually unknown at the firm level, but some reliable estimates of the average weights (across firms) are available at the industry or market level. Distinct from the traditional DEA, the new approach can incorporate constraints on the average values of weight distributions and is built on a computational framework new to the literature. The new model is compared with the traditional CSP approach, using longitudinal investment data by socially responsible funds (SRF). The regression results show evidence that the traditional CSP score, which is widely used in the management literature, may not be a reliable CSP score: firms with higher CSP scores tend to have lower SRF investment (in both the number of SRF and total shares). In contrast, the DEA-based CSP scores show the correct and positive correlation with SRF investment. Overall, this paper contributes to the literature by presenting a more reliable CSP approach and a new, generalizable DEA model. This is also the first empirical work documenting the potential validity issue of the traditional CSP scores. 2024-05-06T08:14:55Z 2024-05-06T08:14:55Z 2024 Journal Article Chen, C. & Li, D. (2024). Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA. Omega, 126, 103072-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103072 0305-0483 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175780 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103072 2-s2.0-85188441875 126 103072 en Omega © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Business and Management
Corporate social performance
Data envelopment analysis
spellingShingle Business and Management
Corporate social performance
Data envelopment analysis
Chen, Chien-Ming
Li, Dan.
Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
description This study develops a new DEA approach to incorporate such market-level information (i.e., average weights over firms) to create a composite corporate social performance (CSP) measure. The new model addresses the challenge that stakeholder expectations—expressed as the CSP weights of different CSP dimensions—are usually unknown at the firm level, but some reliable estimates of the average weights (across firms) are available at the industry or market level. Distinct from the traditional DEA, the new approach can incorporate constraints on the average values of weight distributions and is built on a computational framework new to the literature. The new model is compared with the traditional CSP approach, using longitudinal investment data by socially responsible funds (SRF). The regression results show evidence that the traditional CSP score, which is widely used in the management literature, may not be a reliable CSP score: firms with higher CSP scores tend to have lower SRF investment (in both the number of SRF and total shares). In contrast, the DEA-based CSP scores show the correct and positive correlation with SRF investment. Overall, this paper contributes to the literature by presenting a more reliable CSP approach and a new, generalizable DEA model. This is also the first empirical work documenting the potential validity issue of the traditional CSP scores.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Chen, Chien-Ming
Li, Dan.
format Article
author Chen, Chien-Ming
Li, Dan.
author_sort Chen, Chien-Ming
title Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
title_short Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
title_full Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
title_fullStr Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
title_full_unstemmed Weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA
title_sort weighing in on the average weights: measuring corporate social performance (csp) score using dea
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175780
_version_ 1800916163882909696