Bond-slip model of headed bar and its application to component-based model for precast concrete joints under accidental loads

• Main Authors: Nguyen, Van Hung, Tan, Kang Hai
• Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Engineering; Headed bar; Bond-slip model
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175803
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

This study focused on investigating bond-slip behaviour of headed bars embedded in well-confined concrete. Test results based on eight pull-out specimens under displacement-controlled incremental loading showed that recommended development lengths from ACI318–19 are conservative in developing ultimate strength of headed bars associated with smaller slips than straight bars. Moreover, it was found that different (but sufficiently long) embedment lengths had a significant effect on the free-end slip but negligible effect on the loaded-end slip of headed bars. Additionally, the study highlighted the significance of head bearing in anchorage formation, especially during inelastic stage when bond strength had deteriorated. To address inaccuracy in predicting structural behaviour caused by inadequate anchorage strength of headed bars, a macro bond-slip model was proposed based on correlation in strain distribution obtained from the pull-out tests. Subsequently, the proposed model was incorporated into a component-based model (CBM) and validated against test results of PC joints under seismic loading. A numerical investigation using the validated CBM was conducted to study behaviour of exterior PC joints with headed bars and special detailing. These included Type X joint with X-bent bars and plastic hinge relocation (PHR), and Type A joint with an additional bar layer (ABL) in the beam-joint region, subjected to extreme loads such as seismic action or progressive collapse. The results revealed that seismic behaviour of exterior joints was governed by ductile failure of the beam at the PHR and vertical joint interface in Type X and Type A joints, respectively. Progressive collapse was primarily caused by column failure, with flexural and catenary action effectively preventing collapse. Notably, under both loading conditions, presence of ABL in Type A joint and X-bent bars with PHR in Type X joint improves flexural strength of beams at critical sections and joint shear strength, ultimately enhancing structural performance of joints. Design recommendations include replacing hooked bars with headed bars as well as implementing X-bent bars with PHR and ABL in PC joints. The authors advocate the strong-column-weak-beam design approach as an effective measure to prevent progressive collapse.