Experiment study on energy absorption of multi jet fusion printed cuttlebone-like structure
In the aerospace and automotive industry, there is an increasing need for lightweight cellular structures for good energy absorbing capabilities. The cellular structures offer numerous benefits over conventional energy-absorbing materials and structures, making it a promising choice for applic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/176788 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | In the aerospace and automotive industry, there is an increasing need for lightweight cellular
structures for good energy absorbing capabilities. The cellular structures offer numerous benefits
over conventional energy-absorbing materials and structures, making it a promising choice for
applications such as impact protection, crashworthiness, and vibration damping. However, the
metallic structures used are often expensive and heavier, thus polymeric structures become an
alternative for the design considerations. Additive manufacturing technologies such as MultiJet
Fusion (MJF) technology is particularly suitable for producing cellular structures due to its ability
to cost effectively produce intricate and complex geometries with consistent mechanical
properties.
In this study, the objective is to investigate the effect of curvature walls on energy absorption of
MJF printed cuttlebone-like structures. Four types of lattice structure, namely cuttlebone-like, half
amplitude cuttlebone-like, symmetrical s-shape and straight wall structures were tested at different
loading conditions to investigate their quasi static and dynamic compression energy absorption
behavior. Furthermore, cuttlebone-like structure had the highest maximum energy absorption and peak
load in both quasi static and dynamic compression tests. In quasi static tests, straight wall structure
had the lowest energy absorption capability. In dynamic compression tests, symmetrical s-shape
structures have the lowest energy absorption capability |
---|