Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship

This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matisof, James A.
Other Authors: University of California, Berkeley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-177622
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1776222024-05-29T05:11:40Z Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship Matisof, James A. University of California, Berkeley Arts and Humanities Tibeto-Burman Luish This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, which complements the discussion in Section 5 of the text (Jingpho and Luish). Before arriving at that point, however, it seems necessary to deal with several other issues: (1) the genetic and contactual position of Nungish, with which Jingpho had been supposed to have a special relationship; (2) some genetic or contact relationships of Jingpho other than with Luish; (3) some genetic or contact relationships of Luish other than with Jingpho; and (4) the phonologies of the two chief surviving Luish languages, Kadu and Sak. From one point of view, this paper is an elaboration of Burling's Sal hypothesis, which posits a special relationship among Jingpho, Northern Naga (Konyakian), and Bodo-Garo. It is, however, beyond the scope of the present study to go into detail about the latter two groups. The primary focus of the paper is lexical, and morphological comparisons between Jingpho and Luish are only discussed tangentially Published version 2024-05-29T05:11:40Z 2024-05-29T05:11:40Z 2013 Journal Article Matisof, J. A. (2013). Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 36(2), 15-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.36.2.02 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622 10.32655/LTBA.36.2.02 2 36 15 95 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 2013 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Arts and Humanities
Tibeto-Burman
Luish
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Tibeto-Burman
Luish
Matisof, James A.
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
description This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, which complements the discussion in Section 5 of the text (Jingpho and Luish). Before arriving at that point, however, it seems necessary to deal with several other issues: (1) the genetic and contactual position of Nungish, with which Jingpho had been supposed to have a special relationship; (2) some genetic or contact relationships of Jingpho other than with Luish; (3) some genetic or contact relationships of Luish other than with Jingpho; and (4) the phonologies of the two chief surviving Luish languages, Kadu and Sak. From one point of view, this paper is an elaboration of Burling's Sal hypothesis, which posits a special relationship among Jingpho, Northern Naga (Konyakian), and Bodo-Garo. It is, however, beyond the scope of the present study to go into detail about the latter two groups. The primary focus of the paper is lexical, and morphological comparisons between Jingpho and Luish are only discussed tangentially
author2 University of California, Berkeley
author_facet University of California, Berkeley
Matisof, James A.
format Article
author Matisof, James A.
author_sort Matisof, James A.
title Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
title_short Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
title_full Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
title_fullStr Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
title_full_unstemmed Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
title_sort re-examining the genetic position of jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the jingpho/luish relationship
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622
_version_ 1806059789887733760