Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship
This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, wh...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-177622 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1776222024-05-29T05:11:40Z Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship Matisof, James A. University of California, Berkeley Arts and Humanities Tibeto-Burman Luish This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, which complements the discussion in Section 5 of the text (Jingpho and Luish). Before arriving at that point, however, it seems necessary to deal with several other issues: (1) the genetic and contactual position of Nungish, with which Jingpho had been supposed to have a special relationship; (2) some genetic or contact relationships of Jingpho other than with Luish; (3) some genetic or contact relationships of Luish other than with Jingpho; and (4) the phonologies of the two chief surviving Luish languages, Kadu and Sak. From one point of view, this paper is an elaboration of Burling's Sal hypothesis, which posits a special relationship among Jingpho, Northern Naga (Konyakian), and Bodo-Garo. It is, however, beyond the scope of the present study to go into detail about the latter two groups. The primary focus of the paper is lexical, and morphological comparisons between Jingpho and Luish are only discussed tangentially Published version 2024-05-29T05:11:40Z 2024-05-29T05:11:40Z 2013 Journal Article Matisof, J. A. (2013). Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 36(2), 15-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.36.2.02 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622 10.32655/LTBA.36.2.02 2 36 15 95 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 2013 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Arts and Humanities Tibeto-Burman Luish |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities Tibeto-Burman Luish Matisof, James A. Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
description |
This paper has a twofold aim: (1) to clarify the interrelationships among
several key TB subgroups, especially as concerns Jingpho; and (2) to establish the
Jingpho/Luish relationship on a firmer footing. The heart of the paper is the set of
Jingpho/Luish cognates presented in Appendix III, which complements the
discussion in Section 5 of the text (Jingpho and Luish). Before arriving at that
point, however, it seems necessary to deal with several other issues: (1) the genetic
and contactual position of Nungish, with which Jingpho had been supposed to have
a special relationship; (2) some genetic or contact relationships of Jingpho other
than with Luish; (3) some genetic or contact relationships of Luish other than with
Jingpho; and (4) the phonologies of the two chief surviving Luish languages, Kadu
and Sak. From one point of view, this paper is an elaboration of Burling's Sal
hypothesis, which posits a special relationship among Jingpho, Northern Naga
(Konyakian), and Bodo-Garo. It is, however, beyond the scope of the present study
to go into detail about the latter two groups. The primary focus of the paper is
lexical, and morphological comparisons between Jingpho and Luish are only
discussed tangentially |
author2 |
University of California, Berkeley |
author_facet |
University of California, Berkeley Matisof, James A. |
format |
Article |
author |
Matisof, James A. |
author_sort |
Matisof, James A. |
title |
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
title_short |
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
title_full |
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
title_fullStr |
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
title_full_unstemmed |
Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship |
title_sort |
re-examining the genetic position of jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the jingpho/luish relationship |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177622 |
_version_ |
1806059789887733760 |