Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area
The goal of this paper is to describe some of the syntactic structures that are created through nominalization processes in Himalayan Tibeto-Burman languages and the relationships between those structures. These include both structures involving the nominalization of clauses (e.g. complement c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177742 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The goal of this paper is to describe some of the syntactic structures that are created
through nominalization processes in Himalayan Tibeto-Burman languages and the
relationships between those structures. These include both structures involving the
nominalization of clauses (e.g. complement clauses, relative clauses) and structures
involving the nominalization of verbs and predicates (e.g. the derivation of nouns and
adjectives). We will argue that, synchronically, clausal nominalization, structurally
represented as [clause]NP, is the basic structure underlying many of the nominalizing
constructions in these languages, even though individual constructions embed and alter this
structure in interesting ways. In addition to clausal nominalization, we will illustrate the
presence of derivational nominalization, represented as [V-NOM]N and [V-NOM]ADJ, although
some nominal derivations target the predicate, not the verb root as their domain. We will
also demonstrate that derivational nominalization can be seen as having developed from
clausal nominalization, at least for some forms in some languages, and that the opposite
direction of development, from derivational to clausal structures, is also attested. We will
conclude with some syntactic observations pertinent to recent claims made on the historical
relationship between nominalization and relativization, demonstrating that there are various
ways that these structures can be related. This study is based on data from five Tibeto Burman languages of the Himalayan area: Manange, Dolakha Newar, Mongsen Ao,
Dongwang Tibetan, and Zhuokeji rGyalrong. |
---|